Gerardus Blokdyk

Environmental Risk Analysis A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition


Скачать книгу

Score

      63. Do you all define Environmental risk analysis in the same way?

      <--- Score

      64. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      65. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      66. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      67. Are accountability and ownership for Environmental risk analysis clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      68. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      69. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      70. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      71. What would be the goal or target for a Environmental risk analysis’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      72. Is there a clear Environmental risk analysis case definition?

      <--- Score

      73. Is the Environmental risk analysis scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      74. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      75. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      76. Are the Environmental risk analysis requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      77. When is/was the Environmental risk analysis start date?

      <--- Score

      78. Will a Environmental risk analysis production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      79. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      80. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      81. What is the definition of Environmental risk analysis excellence?

      <--- Score

      82. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      83. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      84. How did the Environmental risk analysis manager receive input to the development of a Environmental risk analysis improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      85. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      86. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      87. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      88. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      89. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      90. Is the scope of Environmental risk analysis defined?

      <--- Score

      91. Have all basic functions of Environmental risk analysis been defined?

      <--- Score

      92. Is Environmental risk analysis required?

      <--- Score

      93. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Environmental risk analysis? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      94. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      95. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      96. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Environmental risk analysis?

      <--- Score

      97. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      98. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      99. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      100. What is the scope of the Environmental risk analysis work?

      <--- Score

      101. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      102. Has the Environmental risk analysis work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      103. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      104. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      105. Is the Environmental risk analysis scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      106. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      107. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Environmental risk analysis brings?

      <--- Score

      108. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      109. How are consistent Environmental risk analysis definitions important?

      <--- Score

      110. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      111. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      112. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      113. What are the Environmental risk analysis tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      114. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      115. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      116. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      117. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      118. Has your scope been defined?

      <---