Score
69. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
70. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
71. Does a method of overfill prevention already exist on the ust(s) in accordance with 40 cfr 280(c)(ii)?
<--- Score
72. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
73. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
74. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
75. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
76. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with RFI?
<--- Score
77. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
78. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
79. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
80. What are the expected benefits of RFI to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
81. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
82. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
83. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
84. Who should resolve the RFI issues?
<--- Score
85. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in RFI? In other words, what are the risks, if RFI does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
86. Think about the people you identified for your RFI project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
87. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom RFI project?
<--- Score
88. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective RFI leader?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the RFI Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you catch RFI definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
2. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
3. Are the RFI requirements testable?
<--- Score
4. What was the context?
<--- Score
5. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
6. Is a fully trained team formed, supported, and committed to work on the RFI improvements?
<--- Score
7. Is there a RFI management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
8. Do you have a RFI success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
9. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
10. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
11. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
12. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
13. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
14. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
15. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
16. How have you defined all RFI requirements first?
<--- Score
17. Who is gathering RFI information?
<--- Score
18. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
19. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
20. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
21. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
22. How did the RFI manager receive input to the development of a RFI improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
23. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
24. How are consistent RFI definitions important?
<--- Score
25. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
26. Is there a clear RFI case definition?
<--- Score
27. What happens if RFI’s scope changes?
<--- Score
28. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
29. What RFI requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
30.