effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
107. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
108. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
109. How do you verify Network transparency completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
110. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
111. What is the Network transparency business impact?
<--- Score
112. How do you measure efficient delivery of Network transparency services?
<--- Score
113. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
114. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
115. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
116. What are the current costs of the Network transparency process?
<--- Score
117. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
118. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
119. What is the total cost related to deploying Network transparency, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
120. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
121. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
122. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
123. Are there competing Network transparency priorities?
<--- Score
124. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
125. What are the costs of delaying Network transparency action?
<--- Score
126. What are the operational costs after Network transparency deployment?
<--- Score
127. Are missed Network transparency opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
128. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
129. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
130. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
131. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
132. What is your Network transparency quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
133. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
134. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Network transparency services/products?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Network transparency Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #4: ANALYZE:
INTENT: Analyze causes, assumptions and hypotheses.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What is the output?
<--- Score
2. Is the Network transparency process severely broken such that a re-design is necessary?
<--- Score
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.