for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Information systems analysis and design Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
2. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
3. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
4. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
5. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
6. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
7. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
8. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
9. What is the scope of the Information systems analysis and design effort?
<--- Score
10. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
11. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
12. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Information systems analysis and design brings?
<--- Score
13. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
14. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Information systems analysis and design?
<--- Score
15. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
16. What is the context?
<--- Score
17. What is the scope?
<--- Score
18. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
19. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
20. What is the scope of Information systems analysis and design?
<--- Score
21. Is the Information systems analysis and design scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
22. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
23. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
24. What are the Information systems analysis and design use cases?
<--- Score
25. What are (control) requirements for Information systems analysis and design Information?
<--- Score
26. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Information systems analysis and design? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
27. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
28. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
29. What Information systems analysis and design services do you require?
<--- Score
30. Have all basic functions of Information systems analysis and design been defined?
<--- Score
31. What Information systems analysis and design requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
32. Will a Information systems analysis and design production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
33. What happens if Information systems analysis and design’s scope changes?
<--- Score
34. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
35. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
36. How do you manage unclear Information systems analysis and design requirements?
<--- Score
37. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
38. Are the Information systems analysis and design requirements testable?
<--- Score
39. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
40. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
41. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
42. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Information systems analysis and design work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
43. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
44. What system do you use for gathering Information systems analysis and design information?
<--- Score
45. Do you all define Information systems analysis and design in the same way?
<--- Score
46. Who are the Information systems analysis and design improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
47. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
48. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
49. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score