Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
119. Is special Message Queuing as a Service user knowledge required?
<--- Score
120. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
121. Who are the Message Queuing as a Service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
122. What are (control) requirements for Message Queuing as a Service Information?
<--- Score
123. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
124. Do you all define Message Queuing as a Service in the same way?
<--- Score
125. What are the core elements of the Message Queuing as a Service business case?
<--- Score
126. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
127. What is the definition of Message Queuing as a Service excellence?
<--- Score
128. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
129. Has the Message Queuing as a Service work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
130. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
131. Is there a Message Queuing as a Service management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
132. Will a Message Queuing as a Service production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
133. How do you manage unclear Message Queuing as a Service requirements?
<--- Score
134. What are the record-keeping requirements of Message Queuing as a Service activities?
<--- Score
135. Will team members perform Message Queuing as a Service work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
136. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
137. How do you manage changes in Message Queuing as a Service requirements?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Message Queuing as a Service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
2. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
3. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
4. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
5. Among the Message Queuing as a Service product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
6. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
7. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
8. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
9. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
10. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
11. What details are required of the Message Queuing as a Service cost structure?
<--- Score
12. How do you verify the Message Queuing as a Service requirements quality?
<--- Score
13. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
14. What are the costs?
<--- Score
15. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
16. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
17. What are the Message Queuing as a Service investment costs?
<--- Score
18. Do you have any cost Message Queuing as a Service limitation requirements?
<--- Score
19. What are the Message Queuing as a Service key cost drivers?
<--- Score
20. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
21. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
22. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
23. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
24. How do you measure efficient delivery of Message Queuing as a Service services?
<--- Score
25. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
26. Which Message Queuing as a Service impacts are significant?
<--- Score
27. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
28. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
29. Are the Message Queuing as a Service benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
30. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
31. Are indirect costs charged to the Message Queuing as a Service program?
<--- Score
32.