Score
68. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
69. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
70. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
71. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
72. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Information criteria work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
73. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
74. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
75. Will a Information criteria production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
76. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
77. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
78. What is the scope of the Information criteria effort?
<--- Score
79. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Information criteria changes?
<--- Score
80. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
81. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
82. Are improvement team members fully trained on Information criteria?
<--- Score
83. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
84. How have you defined all Information criteria requirements first?
<--- Score
85. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
86. What is the scope of the Information criteria work?
<--- Score
87. What are the Information criteria tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
88. Is special Information criteria user knowledge required?
<--- Score
89. Will team members regularly document their Information criteria work?
<--- Score
90. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Information criteria goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
91. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
92. How will the Information criteria team and the group measure complete success of Information criteria?
<--- Score
93. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
94. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
95. Who approved the Information criteria scope?
<--- Score
96. How can the value of Information criteria be defined?
<--- Score
97. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
98. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
99. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
100. Are the Information criteria requirements complete?
<--- Score
101. What Information criteria requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
102. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
103. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
104. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
105. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
106. Who are the Information criteria improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
107. What is the scope of Information criteria?
<--- Score
108. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
109. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
110. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
111. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
112. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
113. Will team members perform Information criteria work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
114. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
115. What are the core elements of the Information criteria business case?
<--- Score
116. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
117. What gets examined?
<--- Score
118. Have all basic functions of Information criteria been defined?
<--- Score
119. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
120. Has the Information criteria work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
121. What are (control) requirements for Information criteria Information?
<--- Score
122.