Anthony G. Siegrist

Participating Witness


Скачать книгу

were first-generation Anabaptists. Yet, since they assumed the propriety of marriage and having children, the scenario of adult conversion could not remain static. Thus, over time, Anabaptist groups have developed various ways of incorporating children. Some have been more successful than others. One method has been a simple adaptation: baptize children—instead of just adults—still assuming of course that these children make a confession of faith. In contrast to the representative sample from the sixteenth century, a 1973 study by Leland Harder and J. Howard Kauffman of four Mennonite denominations and the Brethren in Christ Church showed a downward trend in the age of baptism running through the twentieth century. At the time of that study the median age was just under fifteen.12 Similar observations have been made at the beginning of the twenty-first century.13 And this trend seems to have resonance beyond immediate members of the Anabaptist family. The Baptist theologian James Leo Garrett, for instance, has observed that in some Baptist churches children as young as six are baptized.14 Another Baptist leader, Brian Haymes, attests to something similar. Haymes is from the United Kingdom, and he recounts a visit to the United States, relating that upon meeting other Baptists there he initially was appreciative of their passion for believers’ baptism, but then was “stunned as they [told] me they baptize children of six or seven years of age.”15 Haymes goes on to tell of one of his students who was baffled by similar observations.

      Heirs of the Radical Reformation are now regularly baptizing children, pre- and early-adolescent persons. Certainly there is always a variety of trends at work across the spectrum of Anabaptist groups in North America. My point is not that every group and every individual fits this trend. This sociological snippet demonstrates that the practice is fluid. However, even if only one pre-adolescent child is baptized as a believer, that event would beg for an explanation. The fact that these aberrations seem to have become more common suggests a broad shift pointing to a widespread theological change. The assumption behind incorporating children through believers’ baptism is that the practice still upholds the central Anabaptist affirmation that individuals should be baptized only after making a confession of faith and a genuine decision to begin a disciple’s form of life. It might appear as though this attempt to secure the outcome of our children’s faith development were the only real option for Anabaptist communities today. However, the example of one Anabaptist group stands in contradistinction to this trend—the Old Order Amish (Amish). Their practice shows that, even in the twenty-first century, Anabaptist communities do not need to baptize children.

      Anabaptist Practice of a Different Order

      Q: Should there be an age limit in the baptism of children?

      The New Testament gives none, but it does teach us the seriousness of baptism and of becoming a member of the Bride of Christ, His Church (Eph 5:27; Matt 18:15–18; 1 Cor 12:12–27). This decision to serve God is the most important event in one’s life. It is not for children but only for those who have reached the age of understanding and maturity. The new birth comes to a thinking, surrendered believer, not to an immature child who is easily influenced and hardly able to comprehend the gravity of the matter.

      Q: How then can we know if a person is old enough for baptism?

      Baptism, in the Amish view, implies saying “Yes” to Christ and “No” to the world. It commits one to the community of faith and grants access to the resources of grace that lie within it. It makes individual pride and desires secondary to the discernment of the community.