Jack D. Kilcrease

The Self-Donation of God


Скачать книгу

Would he not simply be bearing witnesses to the fact that there are people who proclaim Jesus and not that his sources were those who were directly appointed to be eyewitnesses to him?286

      As in the other gospels, Luke portrays Jesus as an exorcist and healer. This does not detract from Luke’s description of Jesus as a new David, but rather shows how the Third Evangelist views Jesus’s fulfillment of this role. Jesus’s war for the kingdom is not with temporal enemies, but with Satan and the demonic forces of the old creation (Luke 11:20). After his disciples return with joy from battling the devil in Jesus’s Name, Jesus exclaims “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven” (10:18). The devil, as the source of all evil, is the direct or indirect source of all disease and demonic possession. In combating these things therefore he is the one who Jesus and his disciples overcome through the power of the Holy Spirit.

      Jesus’s announcement of Jubilee and the forgiveness of sins also works against and finally defeats the devil. Though Satan is certainly the enemy of God, he is also an accuser of humanity in the heavenly court (Job 1:6–8, 2:1–7; Zech 3:1–10; Rev 12:10). In this sense, the devil maintains his power through his ability to accuse. Understood in this light, Jesus’s forgiveness of sins and his sacrificial death are the true exercises of his office as king. Luke, it would appear, also envisions the Church throughout Acts as continuing this mission of Jesus to the ends of the earth. After the ascension, the apostles persist in Jesus’s activities of preaching, teaching, celebrating the sacraments, and engaging in healings and exorcisms.

      It has often been argued that Luke utterly lacks an atonement theology. Both Hans Conzelman and James D. G. Dunn have claimed that Luke has no understanding of Jesus’s death as being sacrificial or directly redeeming.298 Roy Harrisville, while acknowledging both Dunn and Conzelman’s objections, counters their claim by citing Gerhard Fredrich, who points to Luke’s report of the words of institution (Luke 22:19–20), and also Philip’s reading of the Fourth Servant Song (Isa 53) with the Ethiopian eunuch (Acts 8:26–40).299 We are also told that when Jesus begins his ministry he is “about thirty years” (Luke 3:23). This is the same age (according to Numbers 4:3) that priests began their service in the tabernacle/temple.300

      More subtly, Jesus’s fulfillment of priestly mediation is suggested by the fact that Luke chooses to begin and end his gospel in the temple (Luke 1:8, 24:52). This appears to mean that the entire story of Jesus has been bounded by and therefore finds its meaning in the temple. It also strongly implies that Jesus has fulfilled and taken over the function of the temple. This interpretation makes a great deal of sense in light of the data that we have earlier examined that suggests that Luke views Jesus as the returning kavod, as well as a final universal sacrifice for the forgiveness of sins. Through Word and sacrament, Jesus mediates God’s presence, holiness, and the forgiveness of sins to the Church.

      John’s Gospel and Letters301

      Much like Mark’s gospel, John’s gospel is one of glory and humiliation. John, nonetheless, works with these themes differently than Mark. As we observed earlier, Mark reveals Jesus’s glory and humiliation through a pattern of alternation. John is much more comfortable describing Jesus’s glory in a pattern of paradoxical disclosure and hiddenness. John describes Jesus as the one who makes his power and glory known by his act of humiliation. His humiliation is the very act of his exaltation. His veiling is the unveiling of his revelation.

      John begins his gospel by telling his audience that Jesus is the true divine Word who spoke forth the original creation (John 1:1–4). Jesus is also the true glory of God. His light has shown in the darkness and triumphed over it (1:5). This also seems to suggest John’s identification of Jesus with the Servant of Isaiah 49:6 who is a “light to the nations” in that he is “true light, which enlightens everyone, and is coming into the world” (1:9).302

      As Rudolf Schnackernburg observes, John posits that Jesus is greater than Moses. Whereas Moses desired to see God, but was only allowed to do so indirectly, Jesus is God himself come in the flesh.303 Indeed, as Charles Gieschen adds, Moses’s revelation is of a lesser variety than that of Jesus, because Jesus has directly seen the Father as no one else has.304 Whereas Moses only ascended to Sinai, Jesus has descended from heaven and will ascend there again: “no one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man” (3:13). As the true kavod himself, Jesus himself is the source of all glory. Moses’s face merely reflected glory, but Jesus is the glory of God in person.