The 20th Century Cyber War Zone Operations Part One. Perry M.D. Ritthaler

blending of the positive ideas and conditions above is the key to providing positive strategy on the battlefield. Once these ideas are put into actions taken by both sides, sooner or later the strategist that uses these tools properly can shape the outcome of the war on the battlefield.

      Timing is also a critical part of battlefield strategy. The strategist must be able to research the battlefield objectives of all players involved that lead each side of the opposing forces.

      Each objective the strategist must contend with also has external forces that shape the battlefield.

      Some countries make their money by mining those countries resources at the end of a war. They may play an active covert role in starting the war or in the loan funding of that war. They accomplish these economic objectives by not placing one soldier or boot on the ground. After the political landscape has been altered potentially peaceful and financially prosperous they quietly swoop in and purchase the resources for pennies on the dollar.

      These are the true financial capitalists that have evolved in the 21^st Century.

      In fact those countries like China will provide or sell weapons to the Taliban and lend money to the USA for war until the battlefield is safe. Then they actively mine the mineral resources of that country while collecting the interest and debts created to start the war that opened that countries door to the capitalist country.

      Some countries involved in the war like the USA are used to making money on tourism and trade or corporate growth of that economy.

      The best war strategy comes into planning when all sides of the country occupation are analyzed and strategy is developed to benefit those living within the occupied country.

      In fact most wars are created because governments and war strategists believe they can invade that country. Their goal is to manage and make a profit on those countries mineral resources better than the existing people in power running that country.

      If you look at the example of Afghanistan you can see China mining the resources of copper and the USA mining the natural gas. Set up corporations to harvest natural gas resources and security to build private military employment programs and a corporate environment in the region are all different intertwining objectives.

      The people who live in the region will benefit slightly from democracy and the new freedoms that are created to help build employment opportunities in the new capitalist environment.

      It is usually the rich that understand this strategy that benefit most from these financial and economic war psychology equations.

      As the economic giants and military super powers move into a region, the lifestyle of the local people is improved moderately. Provided the new democracy can control the drug addictions of the people and peace process of that country.

      Going to war with freedom fighters against these great giants can only bring death or hardship to the people in the region.

      The strategy behind the operations of those countries affected by the giants must be peaceful, quick and powerful. That means the strategist protecting that country cannot be bribed or sick from battlefield fatigue, nor have a body bag chip on the shoulder because your family has been slaughtered in the war.

      Penetrating the political leadership established by the capitalist countries, with people that have the best interests of the country being targeted, is the safest way to preserve that countries ethics and morals.

      However as the corporate war giants influence the region the people will need to change and adapt creatively. Or be killed covertly in the name of spreading liberty, freedom and democracy peace to the region.

      As the battlefield evolves into a capitalist environment, so does the security to protect that capitalistic environment harvesting the invaded countries mineral resources.

      Figuring out ways to cooperate and make money in this environment is the key to that countries stability and overall happiness of the civilian population. The hidden benefit to this war occupation creating democracy is the civilians can now vote and collectively control that politically representation of that country.

      The more peace and stability in the region the better the chances for people to move into the political leaders positions. Positions that protect the cultural and moral or faith values of that country, being invaded by the capitalist and military power giants.

      This means the more peace and stability in that region the better the chances of controlling the growth and direction of that country. For example ever suicide bomber now empowers the invading capitalist forces because it gives them political reasons to flex their military muscle designed to control the population. Every time they do the country is destabilized and another capitalist country purchases more of those invaded countries mineral resources at bargain basement prices.

      Learning to mutually benefit in the environment of these giants on the battlefield is the best way to split the economics diamonds being mined on the battlefields in the Middle East or Africa. The faster you control the peace in the region the better you financially capitalize on those countries resources being targeted and sold off globally.

      What can Palestine or Israel or Libya or Iraq or Iran or Syria learn from the wars being waged in Afghanistan or Iraq?

      Thank you for your important time to read this email.