Daniel W. Graham

Ancient Philosophy


Скачать книгу

compounds. Philosophers writing after Parmenides did not abandon cosmology (except for a few followers of his), but rather proposed more elaborate theories of elements. Empedocles posited four elements: earth, water, air, and fire, a theory so influential that it lasted until about AD 1600. These corresponded roughly to the great cosmic masses of Earth, sea, atmosphere, and fiery heavenly bodies, and they could be supposed to combine to form all other stuffs, including flesh, bone, wood, and iron. About the same time, Anaxagoras posited an unlimited number of elements that could mix together or emerge as the dominant member of the mixture. The most powerful theory that appeared in the fifth century BC was that of the atomists, Leucippus and Democritus, who posited microscopic particles of matter of different shapes that could combine into objects of all kinds.

      Here we meet Socrates (Chapter 3), who arose out of the same culture as the sophists but challenged their sometime immoral or amoral teachings. Unlike the know‐it‐all sophists, he professed not to have any special knowledge. Yet he made tireless efforts to discover the nature of virtue and concepts of right and wrong, asking what virtue was and whether it was teachable (as the sophists assumed it was). Socrates’s question‐and‐answer method and his careful analyses of ethical concepts turned philosophy away from cosmological speculation on the one hand, and from education for political success on the other. In the tumultuous age of the Peloponnesian War which pitted Greek city‐states against each other and brought out some of the worst of human passions and hostilities, Socrates was the self‐appointed gadfly and conscience of his home city of Athens. Somehow, despite his claims to lack any special knowledge, he managed to live a life of spectacular virtue, standing up to the powers of his city a number of times on matters of moral significance. Although he wrote nothing and claimed not to be a teacher, he gathered around him a number of brilliant young men who would carry on his movement into the fourth century BC. When he was accused of impiety and corrupting the youth and put to death by the democracy, his followers vowed to vindicate their master.

      Whereas Socrates was exclusively a moral philosopher dealing with ethical issues, Plato saw a need to support moral philosophy with a strong theory of knowledge (epistemology), a strong theory of reality (a metaphysics), and a theory of the soul (psychology). He posited the existence of eternal realities he called Forms, such as Justice itself, Equality itself, and Goodness itself. He treated abstract concepts such as these as ultimate beings. He viewed the world we live in as a world of Heraclitean change with no permanence. Whatever order and constancy it had, it owed to a connection with the Forms, which he called “participation” or “imitation.” He believed that humans have eternal souls that inhabit human bodies through a cycle of reincarnations. When the soul was outside the body it was more in touch with the Forms than when it was in the body and distracted by its needs. The human soul in a mortal body had a dim awareness of the Forms; by a process of “recollection” it could come to reacquaint itself with the Forms themselves and appreciate them more fully. Plato saw Socrates’s question‐and‐answer method as providing the means to help us rediscover the Forms.

      Plato went on to develop the political theory, a theory of art, a theory of education, and many other theories grounded in his Theory of Forms and its attendant principles. Plato offered the first comprehensive theory of everything in the Western tradition.

      While Plato offered the first comprehensive philosophy, Aristotle offered the first systematic philosophy. He invented the first theory of logic, which he applied to the philosophy of science. He developed his own cosmology, biology, meteorology, psychology, ethics, political theory, rhetoric, philosophy of art, and so on. While Plato covered some of these areas (he shied away from scientific theories in general), Aristotle was unique in compartmentalizing areas of study so that they could be studied rigorously and in depth. Where Plato tended to offer wonderful analogies like those of the Sun, the Line, and the Cave in the Republic, Aristotle offered rigorous argument for almost all of his claims. In retrospect, he was wrong in many of his theories; but he never assumed anything, and rarely let an image stand in for an argument. He seems to have thought of everything and to have covered all his bases when he presented a theory. When his works were recovered in the late medieval period, philosophers tended to be overwhelmed by his system and to accept it as gospel truth. Although Aristotle was a prodigious scientific researcher who, for instance, studied numerous zoological species in the field, collected specimens he dissected, and made important astronomical observations, many of his medieval followers knew him only as a theorist.