Paul R. Josephson

Chicken


Скачать книгу

techniques are proliferating, and chickens of a wide variety of breeds and purposes – meat and eggs – are raised in small-scale settings. But it is a relatively small number of chickens raised this way – hence, my focus on factory-farmed broilers. Here and there, I shall mention ungulates, pigs and other kinds of farm animals to highlight concerns about factory farms generally.

      The chicken industrialization process is going on throughout the world, and this means that, if the United States may have been the originator of the chicken factory farm, then the other nations of the world – and the producers, regulators and consumers in those other nations – share in the moral, social and environmental problems created by the expansion of those farms. Unfettered capitalism is, in essence, the source of the factory farm: it is the driving force behind the industrial ethos of the broiler, and it is evident in the prevailing profit motive of the farms and in the logic of production. All of these countries therefore, to a greater or lesser degree, are responsible for the brutal, international system of food production that has resulted, and hardly the US alone.5

      Chickens are treated as egg producers, meat producers, and dualpurpose types. The broiler – a meat producer – is most often a cross of the White Rock and Cornish breeds. There are others: red broilers, Delaware broilers (crossing Rhode Island Red hens with Barred Plymouth Rock roosters) and others. Plymouth Rock, New Hampshire, Langshans, Jersey Black Giant and Brahmas have also been introduced to the mix. And, finally, breeders have worked to make the broilers white-feathered. All this means that today’s broiler is quite a hybrid animal, and very productive from the point of view of rapid muscle tissue gain. Other breeds do not reach meat slaughter age as quickly, so most operations go with the White Rock / Cornish breed. As will be noted below, the intensive breeding has led the broiler to be at risk for a variety of maladies, and particularly skeletal malformation and dysfunction, skin and eye lesions and congestive heart conditions.

      The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines a CAFO as an AFO (animal feed operation) that has been designated as a point source of pollution. The animals are confined and they are fed, rather than grazing on grass or other vegetation – at their own contentment and pace.11 Yet the EPA had also made the determination that “facility” refers to a structure, and not to an entire farm. CAFOs are further defined by size. Large CAFOs have at least 700 dairy cattle; or 1,000 beef cattle; or 2,500 pigs if they weigh over 55 pounds or 10,000 if they do not; or 30,000 broilers if the AFO has a liquid manure handling system, or 125,000 if it does not. Medium-size CAFOs fall within intermediate size ranges and discharge wastewater or manure to surface waters, while small CAFOs are below the medium-size threshold, but are designated by local permitting authorities as significant contributors of pollutants.12 For all livestock, the mean farm size has grown, and the “production locus” (number of head sold/removed) for over half of the broiler production in the US grew from 300,000 in 1987 to 520,000 in 2002.13 At the same time, the EPA allows certain exceptions to the designation of CAFOs as a point source of pollution, enabling them to spread manure and other waste with inadequate controls, and that waste has polluted lakes, streams, rivers, ponds, wells and land far and wide. Nowhere in the world has the pollution problem been solved. This is ecological dishonesty, and, along with the replacement of small farms with large industrial facilities, it has destroyed communities and ecosystems. However you designate and define a big farm, there are huge quantities of animals and a great deal of shit, no matter whether the sheds are in North America, Asia or Europe.

      One example of this phenomenon is antibiotics. The birds are at risk for a variety of maladies because of immune systems that cannot develop fully before slaughter. Industry turned to antibiotics both to prevent spread preemptively and to accelerate animal growth. Yet many of the costs involved in dealing with complex disease vectors on the scale of pandemics – for example, Avian Influenza – or to manage frequent outbreaks of Salmonella that require treatment of patients, often in hospitals, are borne by the public. Public health specialists worry about the growing antibiotic resistance of bacteria because of the overuse of drugs. Under greater and greater pressure from regulators and medical specialists, industrial chicken farmers have been forced to scale back the application of drugs somewhat. They and their spokespeople now refer to antimicrobials as a panacea for the problem. Recall that all antibiotics are antimicrobials, but not all antimicrobials are antibiotics. This is technically true, but also an Orwellian way to deflect the concerns of the public and regulators about the risks and benefits of antiomicrobials. If you need to use medicines in the production of meat, then is this not prima facie evidence that there is something wrong with the process?