Disaster Education, Communication and Engagement. Neil Dufty

June 2019).

      56 Preston, J. (2012). Disaster Education: ‘Race’, Equity and Pedagogy. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

      57 Pretty, J. and Hine, R. (1999). Participatory Appraisal for Community Assessment. Centre for Environment and Society, University of Essex.

      58 Queensland Department of Emergency Services (2001). Charter for community engagement, Community Engagement Unit, Strategic and Executive Services. Queensland Department of Emergency Services.

      59 Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.

      60 Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

      61 Rosa, E.A. (2008). White, black and grey: critical dialogue with the international risk governance council's framework for risk governance. In: Global Risk Governance: Concept and Practise of Using the IRGC Framework (eds. O. Renn and K. Walker), 101–118. Springer.

      62 Rosa, E.A. and Clarke, E. (2012). A collective hunch? Risk as the real and elusive. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2 (1): 39–52.

      63 Science Communication Unit, University of the West of England, Bristol (2014). Science for Environment Policy Future Brief: Public Risk Perception and Environmental Policy. Report produced for the European Commission DG Environment, September 2014.

      64 Seeger, M.W. (2006). Best practices in crisis communication: an expert panel process. Journal of Applied Communication Research 34 (3): 232–244.

      65  Shaw, R., Shiwaku, K., and Takeuchi, Y. (2011). Disaster Education. Bingley, UK: Emerald.

      66 Shreve, C., Fordham, M., Anson, S., et al. (2014). Report on Risk Perception and Preparedness. TACTIC Project, North Umbria University.

      67 Soden, R. (2017). Citizens' Participation and Crowdsourcing. Words into Action Guidelines: National Disaster Risk Assessment Special Topics. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.

      68 Spence, P.R., Lachlan, K., Burke, J.M., and Seeger, M.W. (2007). Media use and information needs of the disabled during a natural disaster. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 18 (2): 394–404.

      69 Starkey, E., Parkin, G., Birkinshaw, S. et al. (2017). Demonstrating the value of community-based (‘citizen science’) observations for catchment modelling and characterisation. Journal of Hydrology 548: 801–817.

      70 Steelman, T.A. and McCaffrey, S. (2013). Best practices in risk and crisis communication: implications for natural hazards management. Natural Hazards 65: 683–705.

      71 Terpstra, T., Enader, A., Gutteling, J., and Kuhlicke, C. (2017). Public Perception of Risk in Science for Disaster Risk Management 2017: Knowing Better and Losing Less. Office of the European Union.

      72 Tierney, K. (2014). The Social Roots of Risk: Producing Disasters, Promoting Resilience. Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.

      73 UNISDR (2017). Terminology on disaster risk reduction [Online]. Available: https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology (accessed 19 June 2019).

      74 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2012). The International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011. Quebec, Canada: UNESCO Institute for Statistics Montreal.

      75 Wachinger, G. and Renn, O. (2010). Risk Perception and Natural Hazards. CapHaz-Net WP3 Report, DIALOGIK Non-Profit Institute for Communication and Cooperative Research, Stuttgart.

      76 Wein, A., Potter, S., Johal, S. et al. (2016). Communicating with the public during an earthquake sequence: improving communication of geoscience by coordinating roles. Seismological Research Letters 87 (1, January/February 2016): 1–7.

      77 Williams, D.E. and Olaniran, B.A. (1998). Expanding the crisis planning function: introducing elements of risk communication to crisis communication practice. Public Relations Review 24 (3): 387–400.