alt="Schematic illustration of the three different polarities in Gas–tungsten arc welding."/>
Figure 1.13 Three different polarities in GTAW.
Figure 1.14 Surface cleaning action in GTAW with DC electrode positive.
1.3.2.3 Electrodes
Tungsten electrodes with about 2% ceria (CeO2), thoria (ThO2, somewhat radioactive), or lanthana (La2O3) have better electron emissivity, current‐carrying capacity, and resistance to contamination than pure tungsten electrodes [3]. As a result, arc starting can be easier and the arc more stable. The electron emissivity refers to the ability of the electrode tip to emit electrons. A lower electron emissivity implies that the electrode tip temperature must be higher to emit electrons and hence the risk of melting the tip is also higher.
1.3.2.4 Shielding Gases
The ionization potential is the energy needed to ionize a gas [6]. As shown in Table 1.2, the ionization potentials for argon and helium are 15.7 and 24.5 eV (electron volts), respectively. Since it is easier to ionize argon than helium, the electrical conductivity is higher and the voltage drop across the arc is lower with argon. Also, since argon is heavier than helium, it offers better shielding and greater resistance to cross draft than helium. With DCEP or AC, argon also has a greater oxide cleaning action than helium. These advantages plus the lower cost of argon make it more attractive for GTAW than helium.
Table 1.2 Ionization potentials for gases involved in arc welding.
| Gas | Chemical symbol | Ionization potential (eV) |
| Argon | Ar | 15.7 |
| Carbon dioxide | CO2 | 14.4 |
| Helium | He | 24.5 |
| Hydrogen | H2 | 13.5 |
| Nitrogen | N2 | 14.5 |
| Oxygen | O2 | 13.2 |
Because of the greater voltage drop across a helium arc than an argon arc, however, higher power inputs and greater sensitivity to variations in the arc length can be obtained with helium. The former allows the welding of thicker sections and the use of higher welding speeds. The latter, on the other hand, allows a better control of the arc length during automatic GTAW.
1.3.2.5 Advantages and Disadvantages
The limited heat input of GTAW makes it useful for welding thin gauges, repairing, or welding thick sections that need to be welded with many small passes to ensure good weld quality. Since the filler metal is not the electrode, it can be deposited without melting much of the base metal to dilute it. This is desirable in depositing a wear‐ or corrosion‐resistant layer on steels. It can also be used to weld butt joints of thin sheets by fusion alone – that is, without the addition of filler metals. This is called autogenous welding. Since the GTAW process is a very clean welding process, it can be used to weld reactive metals, such as titanium and zirconium, aluminum, and magnesium.
However, the deposition rate in GTAW is low. Excessive welding currents can cause melting of the tungsten electrode and results in brittle tungsten inclusions in the weld metal. However, by using preheated filler metals, the deposition rate can be improved. In the hot‐wire GTAW process, the wire is fed into and in contact with the weld pool so that resistance heating can be obtained by using a second power source to pass an electric current through the wire.
1.3.3 Plasma Arc Welding
1.3.3.1 The Process
PAW is an arc welding process that melts and joins metals by heating them with a constricted arc established between a tungsten electrode and the metals, as shown in Figure 1.15. It is similar to GTAW, but an orifice gas as well as a shielding gas is used. As shown in Figure 1.16, the arc in PAW is constricted or collimated because of the converging action of the orifice gas nozzle, and the arc expands only slightly with increasing arc length [5]. DCEN is normally used, but a special variable‐polarity PAW machine has been developed for welding aluminum, where the presence of tenacious aluminum oxide films prevents a keyhole from being established.
Figure 1.15 Plasma arc welding: (a) overall process; (b) welding area enlarged and shown with keyholing.
Figure 1.16 Comparison between a gas–tungsten arc and a plasma arc [5].
Source: Welding Handbook, Vol. 2, 7th Edition, © American Welding Society.
1.3.3.2 Arc Initiation
The tungsten electrode sticks out of the shielding gas nozzle in GTAW (Figure 1.12b), but it is recessed in the orifice gas nozzle in PAW (Figure 1.15b). Consequently, arc initiation cannot be achieved by striking the electrode tip against the workpiece as in GTAW. The control console allows a pilot arc to be initiated, with the help of a high‐frequency generator, between the electrode tip and the water‐cooled orifice gas nozzle. The arc is then gradually transferred from between the electrode tip and the orifice gas nozzle to between the electrode tip and the workpiece.
1.3.3.3 Keyholing
In addition to the melt‐in mode adopted in conventional arc welding processes (such as GTAW), the keyholing mode can also be used in PAW in certain ranges of metal thickness (e.g. 2.5–6.4 mm). With proper combinations of the orifice gas flow, the travel speed, and the welding current, keyholing is possible. Keyholing is a positive indication of full penetration and it allows the use of significantly higher welding speeds than GTAW. For example, it has been reported [7] that PAW took one‐fifth to one‐tenth as long to complete a 2.5‐m‐long weld in 6.4‐mm‐thick 410 stainless steel as GTAW. GTAW requires multiple passes and is limited in welding speed. As shown in Figure 1.17,