James G. Speight

Coal-Fired Power Generation Handbook


Скачать книгу

Designation Thickness of band (mm) Remarks Coarsely banded >2 Finely banded or stripped 2–0.5 Microbanded or striated <0.5 Bands not visible to naked eye Mixed banded Both coarse and fine bands Nonbanded (little or no lamination) Cannel and boghead coals that break with conchoidal fracture

      Source: Davis et al. (1941).

      After various attempts to make the fuel ratio of the different coals fit the descriptions of the varieties of coal, it was concluded that coal could be classified according to the fuel ratio within wide limits, and the following divisions were suggested:

images

      There are many compositional differences between the coals mined from the different coal deposits worldwide. The different types of coal are most usually classified by rank, which depends upon the degree of transformation from the original source (i.e., decayed plants) and is therefore a measure of the age of the coal. As the process of progressive transformation took place, the heating value and the fixed carbon value of the coal increased and the amount of volatile matter in the coal decreased.

      Coal contains significant proportions of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen with lesser amounts of nitrogen and sulfur. Thus, it is not surprising that several attempts have been made to classify coal on the basis of elemental composition. Indeed, one of the earlier classifications of coal, based on the elemental composition of coal (Seyler, 1899), was subsequently extended (Seyler, 1900, 1931, 1938). This system (Figure 2.2) offered a means of relating coal composition to technological properties and may be looked upon as a major effort to relate properties to utilization. Indeed, for coal below the anthracite rank, and with an oxygen content less than 15%, it was possible to derive relationships between carbon content (C% w/w), hydrogen content (H% w/w), calorific value (Q, cal gm), and volatile matter (VM, % w/w):

images

      Since these relationships only apply to specific types of coal the application is often limited and it is unfortunate that composition and coal behavior do not exist in the form of simple relationships. In fact, classification by means of elemental composition alone is extremely difficult. Nevertheless, the attempt by Seyler to classify coal should not be ignored or discredited as it offered an initial attempt at an introspective look at coal behavior.

Schematic illustration of a classification by the Seyler System.

      Figure 2.2 Classification by the Seyler System.

      Thus, coal can be divided into four major types; (i) anthracite coal, (ii) bituminous coal, (iii) subbituminous coal, and (iv) lignite coal which show considerable variation in properties (Table 2.5). For the purposes of this text, peat is not classified as being a member of the coal series and, therefore, in this book peat is not included in this system of coal classification (Chapters 1, 2).

      Anthracite is coal of the highest metamorphic rank; it is also known as hard coal and has a brilliant luster, being hard and shiny. It can be rubbed without leaving a familiar coal dust mark on the finger and can even be polished for use as jewelry. Anthracite coal burns slowly with a pale blue flame and may be used primarily as a domestic fuel.

Class and group Fixed carbona (%) Volatile mattera (%) Heating valueb(btu/lb)
Anthracitic
1. Meta-anthracite >98 <2
2. Anthracite 92–98 2–8
3. Semianthracite 86–92 8–14
Bituminous
1. Low-volatile bituminous coal 78–86 14–22
2. Medium-volatile bituminous coal 69–78 22–31
3. High-volatile A bituminous coal <69 >31