Группа авторов

Surface Science and Adhesion in Cosmetics


Скачать книгу

Nitrocellulose (RS ½ sec.)1 3B 0 <10 CA Maleate (0.32 DS) H/2H 94 >200 Sample 1 CAP Maleate (0.10 DS) F 42 98 Sample 2 CAP Maleate (0.25 DS) H 90 >200 Sample 3 CAP Maleate (0.39 DS) H/2H 94 >200 Sample 4 CAP Maleate (0.46 DS) H 91 >200 Sample CAB Maleate (0.41 DS) H/F 92 >200 Sample 6 CAP Methacrylate (0.52 DS) H/F 31 91 Sample 7 CAP Acrylate (0.25 DS) F 43 62 Sample 8 CAB Methacrylate (0.40 DS) F 48 109 Sample 9 CAB Acrylate (0.20 DS) F 29 41 Sample 10 CAP TMI (0.59 DS) 2H 82 >200 Methacrylate (0.30 DS) Sample 11 CAB TMI (0.62 DS) H 88 >200 Methacrylate (0.2 DS) Sample 12

      Sample 8 (CAP Acrylate (0.25) might be a good candidate for GAL-FL or LED. (Control)1: Not formulated, (DS): degree of substitution per glucose ring.

Formulation Lag time (day) Steady-state flux (μg/cm2/day) Permeability coefficient × 10-5 (cm/day) Diffusion coefficient × 10-5 (cm2/day) Drug in nail clipping (μg/cm2)
Curanail film (32 wt.% Amorolfine HCl) 10.4 ± 1.3 2.9 ± 0. 2 5.8 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.5 61.1 ± 14.8
3 wt.% Amorolfine HCl UV-cured film 10.4 ± 0.9 2.4 ± 0.2 7.9 ± 0.7 2.7 ± 0.8 37.5 ± 17.6
4 wt.% Terbinafine HCl UV-cured film 9.5 ± 1.2 1.5 ± 0.1 3.7 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.4 71.1 ± 8.0
Statistical difference between Curanail and Amorolfine UV-cured film? No (p>0.05) Yes (p<0.05) Yes (p<0.05) No (p>0.05) Yes (p<0.05)
Statistical difference between Amorolfine and Terbinafine UV-cured film? No (p>0.05) Yes (p<0.05) Yes (p<0.05) Yes (p<0.05) Yes (p<0.05)