Jelke Bethlehem

Handbook of Web Surveys


Скачать книгу

they look like an attractive source of data to practitioners and researchers. They are wondering if big data could substitute web surveys to provide information for social and economic decision making. They will not substitute surveys; the message is that the two sources are complementary, but they require the researcher to consider the existing methodological problems. The big data offer a challenging opportunity to revise the role and questions faced from the surveys and to integrate web survey data with other data sources.

      1 Exercise 1.1 Which of the following options is not an advantage of computer‐assisted interviewing (CAI) as compared with traditional modes of data collection?Data quality is higher due to included checks.The software is in charge of routing through the questionnaire.CAI leads to higher response rates.Data are processed quicker.

      2 Exercise 1.2 What is an advantage of an e‐mail survey over a traditional mail survey?Data quality is higher due to included checks.There is less under‐coverage.Response rates are higher.It has better facilities for navigation through the questionnaire.

      3 Exercise 1.3 Why were the first surveys on the Internet e‐mail surveys and not web surveys?E‐mail surveys were cheaper.The World Wide Web did not exist yet.E‐mail surveys are more user friendly.E‐mail surveys require less data communication over the Internet.

      4 Exercise 1.4 When should the form‐based approach be preferred over the question‐by‐question approach in a web survey?The questionnaire is very long.The questionnaire contains route instructions and edits.All questions fit on one screen.The survey is a business survey.

      5 Exercise 1.5 Which of the four features is typically and advantage of web surveys?There is no under‐coverage.The sample size is always large.A survey can be designed and conducted very quickly.Accurate estimates can always be computed.

      6 Exercise 1.6 How to avoid the problem of under‐coverage in a general population web survey?Conduct a mixed‐mode survey.Increase the sample size.Conduct a self‐selection web survey.Replace the web survey by an e‐mail survey.

      7 Exercise 1.7 Why source integration is an interesting perspective?To optimize information.To conduct mixed‐mode surveys.To totally avoid web surveys.To run only paper surveys.

      1 Barcaroli, G., Bianchi, G., Bruni, R., Nurra, A., Salamone, S., & Scarnò, M. (2016), Machine learning and statistical inference: the case of Istat survey on ICT. Proceeding of the Italian Statistical Society Conference, SIS, Salerno.

      2 Barcaroli, G., Nurra, A., Salamone, S., Scannapieco, M., Scarnò, M., & Summa, D. (2015), Internet as a Data Source in the Istat Survey on ICT in Enterprises. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 44, pp. 31–43. doi:org/10.17713/ajs.v44i2.53.

      3 Beręsewicz, M., Lehtonen, R., Reis, F., Di Consiglio, L., & Karlberg, M. (2018), An Overview of Methods for Treating Selectivity in Big Data Sources. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

      4 Bethlehem, J. G. (1987), The Data Editing Research Project of the Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics. Proceedings of the Third Annual Research Conference of the US Bureau of the Census, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC, pp. 194–203.

      5 Bethlehem, J. G. (2009), The Rise of Survey Sampling. Discussion Paper 09015, Statistics Netherlands, The Hague/Heerlen, the Netherlands.

      6 Bethlehem, J. G., Cobben, F., & Schouten, B. (2011), Handbook on Nonresponse in Household Surveys. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

      7 Bethlehem, J. G. & Hofman, L. P. M. (2006), Blaise—Alive and Kicking for 20 Years. Proceedings of the 10th International Blaise Users Conference, Arnhem, the Netherlands, pp. 61–86.

      8 Bethlehem, J. G. & Stoop, I. A. L. (2007), Online Panels—A Theft of Paradigm? The Challenges of a Changing World. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Association of Survey Computing, Southampton, U.K., pp. 113–132.

      9 Beukenhorst, D. & Wetzels, W. (2009), A Comparison of Two Mixed‐mode Designs of the Dutch Safety Monitor: Mode Effects, Costs, Logistics. Technical paper DMH 206546, Statistics Netherlands, Methodology Department, Heerlen, the Netherlands.

      10 Biffignandi,