Группа авторов

Biosurfactants for a Sustainable Future


Скачать книгу

href="#ulink_bdcd83cf-941d-5711-8369-68abebcc3167">Figure 1.4, right). The heat of demicellization ΔH demic is equal to the enthalpy difference between the two extrapolated lines in Figure 1.4. Thus, the cmc and the enthalpy of micellization are simultaneously determined, but independently to each other.

. The interval of temperatures used in these studies is rarely larger than 30–40 °C. Within this interval, the dependence of ΔH demic for most of the surfactants is linear with T, meaning that
is constant ([100] and references therein). While ΔH demic may be either positive (endothermic) or negative (exothermic),
for the demicellization process is always positive. This means that the hydrophobic surface of monomers, being exposed to water, increases upon demicellization. For this reason, it is frequently observed that ΔH demic is negative at low temperatures and positive at high ones. The formation of a micelle requires that some water molecules surrounding each monomer must be lost in the aggregation process to form the final aggregate. The process also contributes to a favorable entropy term for micellization. Thus, the transfer of surfactant monomers from an aggregate to the bulk water has many facts in common with the dissolution of liquid alkanes into water [101]. Gill et al. [102] have noticed that the experimental heat capacity difference between gaseous and dissolved non‐polar molecules in water is correlated with the number of water molecules in the first solvation shell. They concluded that a two‐state model, in which each water molecule in the solvation shell behaves independently, provides a satisfactory basis to quantitatively describe the heat capacity properties of the solvation shell. For a series of solutes (most of them being hydrocarbon compounds), an average value of ~13.3 J/mol K (see the theoretical line shown in Figure 1.1 at 25 °C of that paper) was estimated for the contribution of each water molecule to
.

      Calorimetric measurements of vapor equilibrium of the system cyclohexane‐heptane were performed almost 70 years ago by Crutzen et al. [103]. These authors observed that between 40 and 60 °C, the increase in the molar free Gibbs energy becomes small because of the partial compensation of the heat of mixing and the entropy of mixing. Since then, many papers have been published in which the concept enthalpy–entropy compensation (EEC) has been taken into consideration. Arguments for or against EEC have been published and, for surfactant systems, EEC has been reviewed several times [100,104–106]. For demicellization (or equivalently micellization), the relationship is written linearly as

      (1.21)

      where T c = (H/S) P is known as the compensation temperature.

      Recently, Vázquez‐Tato et al. [100] have shown that “it is possible to obtain as many compensation temperature values as the number of temperature intervals in which the dependencies of enthalpy and entropy changes with temperature are analyzed.” Furthermore, “the value of each T c will agree with the central value T o of each temperature interval.” These authors concluded that “T c is simply such experimental T o ” without any physical meaning and concluded that it “does not provide any additional information about the systems.” In other words, any physical interpretation derived from T c (and by extension from ΔH c ) is meaningless.

      Recently Olesen et al. [96] have published a method for analyzing the ITC curves that allows the determination of the aggregation number. As in previous cases, we will limit the presentation to neutral surfactants. The mass‐action model and monodispersity of micelles are assumed.

      In 1978, Turro and Yekta [110] presented a simple procedure for determination of the mean aggregation number of micelles by measuring the steady‐state fluorescence quenching of a luminescent probe by a hydrophobic quencher. The Poisson statistics to describe the distribution of the luminescent molecule D and the quencher Q in a solution that contains a well‐defined but unknown micelle concentration [M] was accepted. Both D and Q are selected in such a way that they reside exclusively in the micellar phase. D will partition itself both among micelles containing Q and among “empty” micelles. They also assumed that only excited micelles of D, D*, emit in the micelles containing no Q, i.e. D* is completely quenched when it occupies a micelle containing at least one Q. Under these conditions a “very simple expression” for obtaining the aggregation number is deduced.