Группа авторов

The Handbook of Solitude


Скачать книгу

adulthood. However, equally represented here is heterogeneous nature of solitude, with various different conceptualizations, types, and psychological processes related to solitude represented. Mumper and Klein (Chapter 7) examine the construct of temperament known as behavioral inhibition (the tendency to exhibit fearful/withdrawn behavior in response to unfamiliar people and novel contexts), including the genetic, biological, cognitive, and environmental risk factors associated with its development, maintenance, and links with psychopathology. Coplan, Ooi, and Hipson (Chapter 8) then explore the causes and consequences of different solitary activities in a variety of contexts (school and nonschool settings) from early childhood to adolescence. Whereas Coplan and colleagues address, among other things, aspects of solitude that youth choose to engage in, Ladd and colleagues (Chapter 9) continue the discussion of solitude in interpersonal contexts but focus on aspects of solitude that children and adolescents rarely choose. Specifically, the chapter shines light on the negative aspects of peer experiences that include rejection, exclusion, and victimization. Continuing with an emphasis on the role of experiences with peers, Bowker, White, and Etkin (Chapter 10) focus their lens specifically on the period of adolescence as they examine social withdrawal and experiences at both the group (e.g., rejection, exclusion) and dyadic (e.g., friendships) levels of social complexity.

      The third section of the handbook is aimed at unpacking the complexity that is solitude. The section attempts to showcase the number of different ways to think about aspects of solitude, including different constructs, processes, and contexts, that when combined increase our understanding of the broader concept of solitude. To begin the section, Nikitin and Schoch (Chapter 14) employ the lens of social approach motivations (dispositional motivation to approach positive social outcomes), and social avoidance motivations (the dispositional motivation to avoid negative social outcomes) to explain why some individuals are better able to establish and maintain satisfying social relationships than others. That is followed by Wesselmann and colleagues’ (Chapter 15) treatment of the painful experience of ostracism including the various affective, cognitive, and behavioral reactions to being ignored and excluded. Next, Nguyen, Weistein, and Ryan (Chapter 16) explore some of the myriad of factors that serve to shape solitary experiences, including the reasons for which we find ourselves alone, the implications of different solitary activities, and the characteristics of solitude that make it feel more true and authentic to the individual. This chapter also highlights the importance of autonomous (intrinsic) motivations in the positive experience and impact of solitude.

      The next two chapters address a unique context for solitude. As noted previously, the media‐saturated world in which we now live is providing a context that is reshaping how we think about solitude. In exploring the darker side, as it were, of media, Kim (Chapter 17) examines the bidirectional links between problematic use of media and psychological maladjustment with an emphasis on loneliness. Burnell, George, and Underwood (Chapter 18) then highlight how new media has the potential to connect us to others as well as to isolate us from others by focusing on social networking sites and mobile phones and their relation to young people’s social adjustment and maladjustment. Continuing with the notion that solitude has both the potential for good and bad, Paulus, Kenworthy, and Marusich (Chapter 19) explicate how finding the right balance between being alone and being together can promote creativity, and Eccles, Kazmier, and Ehrhart (Chapter 20) look into the world of highly skilled athletes to show how solitude can be a means of rest that has benefits in sport performance and well‐being. The section then concludes by reminding us once again that context matters in our understanding of solitude. Xu and colleagues (Chapter 21) make it poignantly clear that solitude may be experienced uniquely for immigrants who have to constantly deal with the negative biases and stereotypes associated with foreign languages and accents, experiences of acculturation, perpetual foreigner stereotypes, and intergroup anxiety between immigrant and non‐immigrant groups. Taken together, this section provides a clear reminder that to understand solitude’s meaning and impact, we must consider a variety of constructs (e.g., motivations, needs, ostracism), contexts (e.g., peer group, media, sports), and outcomes (e.g., creativity, loneliness, rest, anxiety) related to solitude.