who provides information about his or her culture to the ethnographic fieldworker
Factors influencing choice of research method
There are a number of methods of data collection and associated issues that anthropologists commonly need to consider in their preparation for fieldwork and during the data-gathering phase of their work. When choosing their research topic and research methods, they are influenced by a number of practical, ethical and theoretical issues.
Practical issues
| Time and cost | Observation is time-consuming and expensive compared to a postal questionnaire. All methods cost some money, but some, such as questionnaires or secondary data, are cheaper than others. It may take time and skill to gain acceptance into the group to undertake participant observation. |
| Access | Some cultural situations are far easier to gain access to than others. Market researchers can freely stand in the street to talk to members of the general public, whereas some ‘closed’ research settings, such as schools or prisons, pose more difficulties. Often ‘closed’ settings will only be accessible if entry is approved by a gatekeeper (such as a head teacher in a school). |
| Researcher characteristics and skills | Some topics are difficult for certain researchers: for example, it would be very difficult for a female researcher to conduct participant observation in a monastery or for a man to do so in a convent. Also, some individuals are better at mixing with people and building relationships than others. |
| Subject matter | Some methods suit certain topics and subject matters better than others. |
| Research opportunity | Sometimes the chance to conduct research will happen spontaneously and not allow time to plan questions for a questionnaire or structured interview. For example, Thomas Ward was offered the chance to study a gang’s culture in Los Angeles and used participant observation (see his case study in this chapter, pp. 32–3). |
gatekeeper A person who controls access to a research site
Ethical issues
Ethics refers to moral issues of right and wrong. Ethnographers are obliged to follow ethical principles before, during and after their fieldwork. There are several major anthropological associations that have created codes of ethics. In short, ethnographers have to respect the dignity of people they study as well as take responsibility for how they use their findings after the research is completed.
The Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and Commonwealth and the American Anthropological Association (AAA) have set out guidelines for the conduct of research, including the principles set out in the box below.
| Informed consent | Research participants should be offered the right to refuse to take part. The researcher should tell them about all relevant aspects of the research so that they can make an informed decision. Consent should be obtained before research begins. |
| Confidentiality and privacy | Researchers should keep the identity and personal details of participants confidential in order to help prevent possible negative effects on them. |
| Effects on research participants | Researchers need to be aware of the possible negative effects on participants, such as police intervention, harm to education or employment, social exclusion and psychological damage. If someone is asked to talk about a sensitive event in their life, such as abuse or rape, they may also find this upsetting. |
| Covert research | This is when the researcher’s identity and purpose are hidden from the people being studied. It can create serious ethical problems, such as deceiving or lying to people in order to win their trust or obtain information. It is impossible to gain informed consent while at the same time keeping the research or its purpose secret. Anthropology does not use covert observation during research. However, some anthropologists argue that the use of covert methods may be justified in certain circumstances (see Chapter 14). |
| Involvement in illegal acts/danger | If the researcher is investigating a deviant gang or group, for example, they may have to take part in or be seen to condone illegal behaviour. They may also be in danger, particularly if the gang members think that they might be deceived (see Thomas Ward’s study, pp. 32–3). |
covert observation When a study is carried out ‘under cover’: the researcher’s identity and purpose of research are concealed from the group
Ethical guidelines for ethnographic research from the AAA The goal of anthropology is to spread anthropological knowledge and its use to solve human problems. Anthropologists work in a variety of contexts studying all aspects of human experiences; in doing so, they face numerous ethical dilemmas. What is presented here is intended to reflect core principles shared across subfields and contexts of practice (Principles of Professional Responsibility, issued by the AAA). They cover a range of guidelines put together by the AAA to address the particular issues related to anthropological study, including:
do no harm;
be open and honest regarding your work;
obtain informed consent and necessary permissions;
weigh competing ethical obligations due collaborators and affected parties;
make your results accessible;
maintain respectful and ethical professional relationships.
Theoretical issues
Theoretical issues cover questions concerning what anthropologists think culture is like and whether they can obtain an accurate, truthful picture of it. The way in which an anthropologist studies the social world can be influenced by their theoretical beliefs about society.
| Validity | A valid method is one that produces a true or genuine picture of what something is really like. It allows the researcher to get close to the truth. Many anthropologists argue that qualitative methods such as participant observation provide a more valid or truthful account of what it is like to be a member of a group than quantitative methods such as a questionnaire. |
| Reliability | A reliable method is one that, when repeated by another researcher, gives the same results. Quantitative methods, such as written questionnaires, tend to produce more easily comparable results than qualitative methods such as observation, but many anthropologists argue that qualitative methods yield a deeper and more complex form of knowledge. |
| Representativeness | A representative method is one where the people studied form a typical cross-section of the group in which the researcher is interested. If the sample selected is representative or typical of the wider population, the findings can be used to make generalizations (for example, statements about the whole group can be made). |
| Choice of topic |
Theoretical issues will impact not only on the choice of method but also on
|