Группа авторов

Tuberculosis and War


Скачать книгу

were annual data. If only occasional surveys were available, this is denoted by a dashed line (almost overlapping for Serbia and Poland) and a hollow circle (triangle for France) to denote the time points for which the annual risk of infection could be calculated. A slope reference is shown as an inlet to allow visual estimation of the average annual decline in the annual risk of infection: for instance, the average annual decline for The Netherlands after 1940 is roughly between 10 and 15%.

      No increase was noted at any time during the war years in both England and Wales and in the Netherlands, but there was an abrupt change in 1940 when the continuity of the downward trend in the risk of infection accelerated substantially. The authors report, however, difficulties with the interpretation of these data from Amsterdam [20]. First, the surveys were not conducted every year. Second, the von Pirquet (percutaneous) testing method that was used was difficult to quantify. Third, the original data were lost and data were read from graphs. Finally, the proportion of reactors among children under the age of 2 years was much larger than would have been expected from older children. A possible interpretation postulates that this might have been attributable to infection from M. bovis as mandatory pasteurization of milk did not begin in the Netherlands until 1940. The introduction of obligatory pasteurization of milk appears to coincide temporally with the acceleration in the decline of the risk of infection. However, such an interpretation is highly questionable if one considers that a delay must be expected between the time point a change in infection incidence occurs and the time this change becomes reflected in a change in the calculated average annual infection risk. There is no such delay here – the change is abrupt and occurs in 1940. Thus, the temporal coincidence between measures against bovine tubercle bacilli and the change in the risk of infection may not be entirely causal.

      One may conclude that as far as transmission of M. tuberculosis is concerned, there are no data from WWI, and those from WWII are sketchy at best. Surveys from children in Amsterdam in the Netherlands and from young adults and a selected group of children in France are difficult to interpret, but they do not suggest that there was an excess of transmission of M. tuberculosis to children during WWII years. This might be due to problems in interpreting tuberculin skin test prevalence data that typically lag in showing effects of changing transmission incidence. Alternatively or in combination, it might indeed be that while the incidence of infectious TB may have increased, case fatality was accelerated, shortening the average duration of infectiousness. The latter hypothesis will be examined more closely in the following sections. In contrast, when comparative repeat tuberculin test surveys were available from young children, case notification data showed in parallel a tenfold increase in TB; moreover, the prevalence of tuberculin positivity in the children during the civil war in Lebanon more than doubled. The conclusion, therefore, is inescapable that transmission to the youngest generation increased as a result of a massively deteriorating TB situation temporally correlated with the war.

      Tuberculosis Morbidity