A, Von Brevern M, Lempert T, Newman Toker D: First consensus document of the committee for the classification of vestibular disorders of the bárány society. J Vestib Res 2009;19:1–13.
2Seemungal B, Kaski D, Lopez-Escamez JA: Early diagnosis and management of acute vertigo from vestibular migraine and Ménière’s disease. Neurol Clin 2015;33:619–628.
3Hamid MA: Ménière’s disease. Pract Neurol 2009;9:157–162.
4Jeong SH, Kim HJ, Kim JS: Vestibular neuritis. Semin Neurol 2013;33:185–194.
5Lee SH, Kim JS: Acute diagnosis and management of stroke presenting dizziness or vertigo. Neurol Clin 2015;33:687–689.
6Lee H, Ahn BH, Baloh RW: Sudden deafness with vertigo as a sole manifestation of anterior inferior cerebellar artery infarction. J Neurol Sci 2004;222:105–107.
7Brandt T, Dieterich M: Skew deviation with ocular torsion: a vestibular brainstem sign of topographic diagnostic value. Ann Neurol 1993;33:528–534.
8Strupp M, Fischer C, Hanss L, et al: The takeaway Frenzel goggles: a Fresnel-based device. Neurology 2014;83:1241–1245.
9Lechner C: Open Your Eyes! Video-Oculography Findings in Benign Positional Vertigo Masters of Philosophy [thesis]. University of Sydney, 2015.
10Lechner C, Taylor RL, Todd C, et al: Causes and characteristics of horizontal positional nystagmus. J Neurol 2014;261:1009–1017.
11von Brevern M, Zeise D, Neuhauser H, et al: Acute migrainous vertigo: clinical and oculographic findings. Brain 2005;128:365–374.
12Choi KD, Oh SY, Park SH, et al: Head-shaking nystagmus in lateral medullary infarction: patterns and possible mechanisms. Neurology 2007;68:1337–1344.
13Kattah JC, Talkad AV, Wang DZ, et al: HINTS to diagnose stroke in the acute vestibular syndrome: three-step bedside oculo motor examination more sensitive than early MR diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke 2009;40:3504–3510.
14Islam N, Plant GT, Acheson JF: Saccadic lateropulsion or ipsipulsion. Acta Ophthalmol 2008;86:688–689.
15Kheradmand A, Zee DS: Cerebellum and ocular motor control. Front Neurol 2011;2:53.
16Brandt T, Dieterich M: “Vestibular falls.” J Vestib Res 1993;3:3–14.
Miriam S. Welgampola
Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Central Clinical School, University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2050 (Australia)
E-Mail [email protected]
Clinical Evaluation of the Dizzy Patient
Lea J, Pothier D (eds): Vestibular Disorders. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. Basel, Karger, 2019, vol 82, pp 12–31
DOI: 10.1159/000490268
______________________
I. Pyykköa · J. Zoua, b · R. Gürkovc · S. Naganawad · T. Nakashimae–g
aHearing and Balance Research Unit, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; bDepartment of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; cDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Campus Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany; dDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, eIchinomiya Medical Treatment and Habilitation Center, Ichinomiya, fDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, and gDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
______________________
Abstract
Multidetector computed tomography has been the benchmark for visualizing bony changes of the ear, but has recently been challenged by cone-beam computed tomography. In both methods, all inner ear bony structures can be visualized satisfactorily with 2D or 3D imaging. Both methods produce ionizing radiation and induce adverse health effects, especially among children. In 3T magnetic resonance imaging, the soft tissue can be imaged accurately. Use of gadolinium chelate (GdC) as a contrast agent allows the partition of fluid spaces to be visualized, such as the bulging of basilar and Reissner’s membranes. Both intravenous and intratympanic administration of GdC has been used. The development of positive endolymph imaging method, which visualizes endolymph as a bright signal, and the use of image subtraction seems to allow more easily interpretable images. This long-awaited possibility of diagnosing endolymphatic hydrops in living human subjects has enabled the definition of Hydropic Ear Disease, encompassing typical Meniere’s disease as well as its monosymptomatic variants and secondary conditions of endolymphatic hydrops. The next challenge in imaging of the temporal bone is to perform imaging at the cellular and molecular levels. This chapter provides an overview of current temporal bone imaging methods and a review of emerging concepts in temporal bone imaging technology.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
Introduction
Rapid development of radiological equipment over the last several decades has significantly promoted the role of imaging in otology. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have become an integral part of the evaluation of children and adults with hearing loss and diseases associated with temporal bone. The currently used multidetector CT (MDCT) techniques allow bony tissue determination with an accuracy of 0.1 mm. Recently, cone-beam CT (CBCT) technology has become particularly attractive for temporal bone imaging as CBCT imaging reduces the exposure to ionizing radiation when compared with traditional MDCT. However, changes in inner ear fluid spaces became possible only with 3T or higher MRI equipment in combination with contrast agents and special imaging techniques.
Abnormalities on CT or MRI are found in 20–50% of children with sensorineural hearing loss and correlate with the degree of hearing loss [1]. Imaging of the temporal bone by using both MRI and MDCT is likely the future gold standard for temporal bone imaging [2]. Some recent and novel imaging methods have been currently used experimentally in temporal bone studies but have not yet been applied clinically and these may provide additional imaging benefits