Группа авторов

The Nursing Associate's Handbook of Clinical Skills


Скачать книгу

this includes documentation and record‐keeping) must be at the forefront of policy and practice, and the nursing associates have to ensure that all they do are done in the best interest of those they have the privilege to care for.

      Language that is used in record‐keeping must also be jargon free. It is worth remembering that the language used in the record could be interpreted or misinterpreted by any of the previously mentioned groups, including families, patients, allied health professionals and external agencies such as the police. There are abbreviations that are commonly used in all walks of life such as National Health Service (NHS) which most people would know refers to the NHS; however, there are many times when jargon or abbreviations should not be used, for example, MI which could stand for myocardial infarction but could equally stand for motivational interview or DOD which could mean date of discharge or date of death.

      This does not mean that medical terminology and abbreviations should not be used such as cerebrovascular accident (CVA) as opposed to writing stroke (note the convention of writing the term in full and then abbreviating the term afterwards. This gives clarity as to abbreviations and their meaning later in the record.) In this instance, it is the lay term stroke that has several meanings, whereas CVA is quite explicit.

      Due to instances where a word used in a record has had different connotations and the appropriate or required action has subsequently not been forthcoming, the requirement for records to be made clear by being jargon free is apparent. Linked to this section, there has to be a consideration of spelling.

      Many computer programmes used for record‐keeping contain spell checkers, although these should not be relied upon as when words are not spelt correctly but the misspelled word is still a word, the spell checker would overlook this. For example, if the word ‘loose’ was mistyped as ‘lose’, this would have a different meaning, but as it may be a proper word, the mistake would be undetected by the computer. This highlights the importance of proofreading the entries, as other healthcare and social care professionals reading this record would assume that the patient had lost their bowels completely rather than having diarrhoea which is the intended message.

      In written records, there are no spell checkers that can be used. Few nursing associates or registered nurses would be able to ever say that they had never made a spelling mistake or typing error within a record; how these are managed and minimised can improve the accuracy and clarity of the record. In some instances where perhaps a drug name is being recorded or a diagnosis is being written, it is essential that the word is spelt correctly. In these instances, it is a good practice to use a good nursing or medical dictionary. Many of these dictionaries are available online and are easily accessible through apps on mobile devices. The earlier guidance regarding making corrections is important so that the reader can see that the misspelled word has been changed and that the crossed‐out word was nothing more than a correction and not an attempt to alter or falsify a record. While discussing clarity of a record, it has to be considered that a record should be timed and not just dated to demonstrate that care has been provided and there is sequential logic to the entry.

      Supporting Evidence

      The Royal College of Nursing (2010) has produced some good suggestions in a tool kit, for nursing associates and other healthcare professionals with dyslexia, dyspraxia and dyscalculia.

      The subject of speculation in records made by nursing associates is an important requirement when considering clarity. Not making any speculation in record‐keeping requires accuracy, and there must be no guessing, for example, recording that a person with a high temperature may be septic when the diagnosis has not been confirmed by a senior nurse or doctor demonstrates speculation. All records must be factual in nature.

      Touch Point

      How could these five records be documented so that they are not speculative?

Mrs Jones has a high temperature
Mr Thomas has passed a large amount of urine this afternoon
Mrs Kowalczyk’s blood glucose is high, and she will probably have a stroke
Mrs Evans has diarrhoea; she must have eaten something bad
I think Mr Morgan is in pain

      Speculation could also be interpreted as an attempt to gamble. Putting this into the context of record‐keeping, it would mean drawing conclusions with only part of the evidence; here, the nursing associate speculated and fails to consider facts. Gambling could mean that there is a 50% chance that the conclusion drawn is correct. This means that there is also a 50% chance that the conclusion drawn is incorrect; therefore, all records must be maintained factually and not speculatively. Similarly, speculation could mean ‘to assume’. Just because a person appears a certain way, an assumption must not be drawn. Again, records must deal in facts only. The next requirement of the NMC Code that relates directly to record‐keeping discusses secure storage.