Группа авторов

Assisted Reproduction Techniques


Скачать книгу

KI, Mumford SL, Segars JH. Is thromboprophylaxis cost effective in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A systematic review and cost analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 224:117–24.

      21 21 Al‐Inany HG, Youssef MA, Aboulghar M, Broekmans F, Sterrenburg M, Smit J, et al. GnRH antagonists are safer than agonists: an update of a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17:435.

      22 22 Nelson SM. Venous thrombosis during assisted reproduction: Novel risk reduction strategies. Thromb Res. 2013; 131 Suppl 1:S1–3.

      23 23 Grandone E, Di Micco PP, Villani M, Colaizzo D, Fernández‐Capitán C, Del Toro J, et al. Venous thromboembolism in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: data from the RIETE registry. Thromb Haemost. 2018; 118(11):1962–8.

      24 24 Macklon NS. Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 11(3):463–77.

      25 25 Jesudason WV, Small M. Internal jugular vein thrombosis following ovarian hyperstimulation. J Laryngol Otol. 2003; 117(3):222–3.

       Giulia Mariani1 and José Bellver 1,2

       1 IVI-RMA, Valencia, Spain

       2 Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology. Faculty of Medicine. University of Valencia, Spain

       Case History: A 35‐year‐old woman with a 3‐year history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was referred to a fertility unit to undergo ICSI treatment after 2 years of infertility due to a severe male factor. She had a normal ovarian reserve. The last lupus flare occurred 12 months before and was managed with corticosteroids. At the time of attending the fertility unit, she was not receiving any treatment. At the age of 28, with a different partner, the woman reported a preterm birth at 32 weeks for severe preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction, delivered by cesarean section. In the postpartum period, the patient developed a deep venous thrombosis that was treated with heparin. She was then tested for thrombotic markers and was diagnosed with positive anti‐cardiolipin antibodies.

      SLE is a chronic multisystem autoimmune disease with a highly variable course of flares and remissions[1]. It is characterized by the generation of autoantibodies and the deposition of immune complexes in various organs, causing inflammatory responses and tissue damage [2]. SLE is more prevalent in women, with a female to male ratio of 9:1 and mainly affects young women during their childbearing years [3]. Although the etiology of the disease is not yet fully known, the high prevalence of women suffering from SLE suggests that estrogen hormones play a role in its pathogenesis. Some women with SLE experience menstrual irregularities [4]. Anticoagulant drugs or, more rarely, thrombocytopenia, can contribute to menorrhagia. A hypothalamic‐pituitary‐ovarian (HPO) axis dysfunction or lupus nephritis‐related hyperprolactinemia can lead to amenorrhea. Permanent amenorrhea can also be due to premature ovarian failure, autoimmune or drug induced. Despite these issues, reproductive function in women with mild SLE is comparable to the general healthy population [5]. The patient in the Case History presented with a normal ovarian reserve.

      Accurate preconception counseling is required in SLE patients to assess disease activity and drug compatibility with pregnancy. Pregnancies should be planned during periods of disease stability, and treatment needs to be adjusted to obtain the remission of the disease or modified to avoid its potential teratogenic effects. Well‐controlled disease at conception is associated with better maternal and fetal outcomes. However, the postponement of conception, recommended in SLE patients with active disease until a period of clinical remission or disease stability of at least 6 months, may result in a decrease in the ovarian reserve associated with age [9]. In the Case History, ovarian stimulation was initiated 12 months after the last lupus flare.

      Drugs commonly used in infertility treatments are not contraindicated in patients with SLE. Controlled ovarian stimulation is generally safe for infertile women diagnosed with SLE and/or APS, especially in patients with a stable disease. In the presence of active SLE, poorly controlled arterial hypertension, heart or renal disease and major prior thrombotic events, infertility treatments should be discouraged due to the high risk of maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy [10].

      In aPL‐positive women undergoing ovarian stimulation, an antithrombotic treatment according to the individual risk profile is highly recommended to prevent vascular thrombosis [11]:

       Women with aPL antibodies and a history of thrombosis: should receive therapeutic doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and low dose aspirin (LDA) from the beginning of COS;

       Women with aPL antibodies but no history of thrombosis: should receive prophylactic LMWH starting on the day of embryo transfer, in combination with LDA [9].

      In all cases, LMWH should be stopped 12–24 hours before the procedure of egg retrieval and started again 6–12 hours later if no bleeding occurs. LDA should be discontinued 5–7 days before egg retrieval and resumed the following day. According to the 2017 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations, LDA should be stopped only 3 days before oocyte retrieval [9]. Heparin and aspirin are to be maintained until the day of the pregnancy test and should be continued in the case of pregnancy [11].

      In women with only SLE and not APS, anticoagulation is not recommended, but the use of anti‐inflammatory therapy (corticosteroids, immunosuppressants) should be considered depending on the disease activity to prevent SLE flares, especially when gonadotropins are used and serum estradiol level rises [12].