Innovation engineering
1998
|
Morel, L. (1998). Proposition d’une ingénierie intégrée de l’innovation vue comme un processus permanent de création de valeur. PhD thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, Nancy.
|
|
ISE
|
Innovation process
|
2000
|
Boly, V. (2000). Processus d’innovation : contribution à la modélisation et approches méthodologiques. HDR, Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, Nancy.
|
|
ISE
|
Data exchange for technological innovation
|
2001
|
Richir, S., Taravel, B., Samier, H. (2001). Information networks and technological innovation for industrial products. International Journal of Technology Management, 21(3–4), 420–427.
|
|
IE
|
TRIZ – the theory of inventive problem solving (TIPS)
|
2002
|
Cordova-Lopez, E., Lacoste G., Le Lann, J.-M. (2002). Use of Altshuller’s matrix for solving slag problems related to steering knuckle (Part I of II) [Online]. Available at: https://triz-journal.com/use-altshullers-matrix-solving-slag-problems-related-steering-knuckle-part-ii/.
|
|
Automatics/system engineering
|
IE
|
Enterprise modeling
|
1995
|
Vernadat, F. (1995). Modélisation systémique en entreprise : métamodélisation. La modélisation systémique en entreprise, Braesch, C., Haurat, A. (eds). Hermes, Stanmore.
|
|
IE
|
Innovation process modeling
|
2001
|
Tomala, F., Senechal, O., Tahon, C. (2001). Modèle de processus d’innovation. MOSIM01’ : actes de la troisième conférence francophone de modélisation et simulation : conception, analyse et gestion des systèmes industriels. Ghent.
|
|
Management sciences
|
Innovation and organization
|
1985
|
Agrell, P., Hatchuel, A., van Gigch, J.P. (1985). Innovation as Organizational Intervention. California State University Sacramento, School of Business and Public Administration, Sacramento, CA.
|
|
Innovation process
|
1987
|
Hatchuel, A., Agrell, P., van Gigch, J.P. (1987). Innovation as system intervention. Systems Research, 4(1), 5–11.
|
|
Technological system
|
1989
|
Aït-El-Hadj, S. (1989). L’entreprise face à la mutation technologique. Les Editions d’Organisation, Paris.
|
|
Management of technological resources
|
1993
|
Durand, T. (1993). The dynamics of cognitive technological maps. Implementing Strategic Processes, 165–189.
|
|
Management of technology
|
1998
|
Durand, T. (1988). Management pour la technologie : de la théorie à la pratique. Revue française de gestion, (71), 5–14.
|
|
Innovation and management of R&D
|
2001
|
Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., Weil, B. (2001). De la R&D à la RID : de nouveaux principes de management du processus d’innovation. Congrès francophone du management de projet, AFITEP : “Innovation, conception… et projets”, Paris.
|
|
C-K (concept-knowledge) theory
|
2001
|
Hatchuel, A. (2001). Towards design theory and expandable rationality: The unfinished program of Herbert Simon. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(3/4), 260–273.
|
|
Sociology
|
Technological system
|
2002
|
Aït-El-Hadj, S. (2002). Systèmes technologiques et innovation : itinéraire théorique. Editions L’Harmattan, Paris.
|
|
Innovation and stakeholders
|
1988
|
Akrich, M., Callon, M., Latour, B. (1988). A quoi tient le succès des innovations ? 1 : L’art de l’intéressement ; 2 : Le choix des porte-parole. Gérer et comprendre. Annales des Mines, 4–17 and 14–29.
|
|
Technological innovation
|
1987
|
Akrich, M. (1987). Comment les innovations réussissent ? Recherche et technologie, 26–34.
|
|
Technological innovation
|
1994
|
Callon, M. (1994). L’innovation technologique et ses mythes. Gérer et comprendre, 34, 5–17.
|
In France, in particular, Table 2.3 shows that the engineering community interested in innovation has drawn on various disciplines, such as mechanical engineering, production engineering, process engineering, management sciences and sociology.
In any case, the work clearly shows that it was product design that originally concentrated research efforts in the mechanical engineering community under the impetus of Gousty and Kieffer (1988), gradually associating with it the notion of innovation under the “design of new products” (Duchamp 1988).
Conversely, at the same time, the industrial systems engineering community from process engineering advocated a “systems” vision (Castagne 1987). The notion of technological innovation engineering (Castagne et al. 1983; Guidat 1984) and foresight to generate innovation scenarios (Boly 1987) even explicitly appeared (Castagne et al. 1983; Guidat 1984).
This raises the differences in the way of conceiving what prefigures a field of research in innovation: for the former, design is associated with the creation of a product, whereas for the latter, it is a question of designing the processes/processes (the set of unit operations and the process leading to them) to manufacture this product. “It is obvious that it is necessary to abandon, for example, the belief in ‘harvesting’ technological innovation to move on to the concept of ‘cultivated’ innovation” (Castagne 1987). We believe that the precursory genius of Pierre Le Goff, Professor of Process Engineering in Nancy, in the holistic understanding of the world, is not insignificant. Indeed, as early as 1979, he published an article that was a forerunner of what has become a systemic vision of energy recommending the association of ecological, economic and technical points of view (Le Goff 1979).
In any case, research conducted on innovation is eminently confronted with what (Lemoigne 1984) qualifies as “the paradoxes of the engineer”3: the difficulty of conceiving a complexity arising from realities held to be inconceivable by our reason (paradox of conceiving complexity and complexity of design (action of designing and its result)).
It is also important to underline the publishing activity of colleagues, engineers by training, who have acquired a double competence through a doctorate in management sciences and sociology and whose contribution to the development of industrial systems engineering and innovation is undeniable. This is a question of citing the work carried out by A. Hatchuel (Agrell et al. 1985; Hatchuel
