Группа авторов

Clinical Guide to Fish Medicine


Скачать книгу

Baton Raton, FL: CRC Press.

      130 Turner, C.L. (1947). Viviparity in teleost fishes. Science Monthly 65: 508–518.

      131 Tzaneva, V., Vadeboncoeur, C., Ting, J., and Perry, S.F. (2014). Effects of hypoxia‐induced gill remodelling on the innervation and distribution of ionocytes in the gill of goldfish, Carassius auratus. Journal of Comparative Neurology 522: 118–130.

      132 Wainwright, P.C. and Turingan, R.G. (1997). Evolution of pufferfish inflation behavior. Evolution 51: 506–518.

      133 Waltrick, D., Awruch, C., and Simpfendorfer, C. (2012). Embryonic diapause in the elasmobranchs. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 22: 849–859.

      134 Weil, C., Lefèvre, F., and Bugeon, J. (2013). Characteristics and metabolism of different adipose tissues in fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 23: 157–173.

      135 Wilga, C.A. and Lauder, G.V. (2004). Biomechanics of locomotion in sharks, rays, and chimeras. In: Biology of Sharks and their Relatives, 1e (eds. J.C. Carrier, J.A. Musick and M.R. Heithaus), 139–164. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

      136 Withers, P., Hefter, G., and Pang, T.S. (1994). Role of urea and methylamines in buoyancy of elasmobranchs. Journal of Experimental Biology 188: 175–189.

      137 Wood, C.M., Kajimura, M., Bucking, C., and Walsh, P.J. (2007). Osmoregulation, ionoregulation and acid‐base regulation by the gastrointestinal tract after feeding in the elasmobranch (Squalus acanthias). Journal of Experimental Biology 210: 1335–1349.

      138 Wootton, R.J. and Smith, C. (2014). Reproductive Biology of Teleost Fishes. Ames, IA: Wiley.

      139 Yanong, R.P. (2003). Necropsy techniques for fish. Seminars in Avian and Exotic Pet Medicine 12: 89–105.

      140 Zang, L., Shimada, Y., Nishimura, Y. et al. (2013). A novel, reliable method for repeated blood collection from aquarium fish. Zebrafish 10: 425–432.

       Catherine A. Hadfield

       Seattle Aquarium, Seattle, WA, USA

      Fish health is dependent on the aquatic environment; appropriate management of water parameters is critical. The term “water quality” is commonly used when discussing these parameters. At a minimum, water quality management typically encompasses temperature, salinity, nitrogenous wastes, pH, hardness, alkalinity, and dissolved gases. Other critical parameters include additional anions and cations, chlorines, heavy metals, turbidity, and the microbiome. These values are interdependent and should be evaluated together, along with the history and observation of the system and animals.

      The goal of this chapter is to provide a concise review of major parameters, including common sampling and testing methods, target values, and major interactions. Values should be compared to the known requirements for the species in the system; it is important to bear in mind that the preferences of different species held in the same habitat may vary. The parameters change over time and both recent values and historical trends need to be considered. Rapid changes are more likely to negatively impact health than slow changes, and are more likely in smaller volumes of water. Management options for water quality problems (e.g. low dissolved oxygen or high ammonia) are covered in Chapter C1.

      Dissolved oxygen (DO) is critical to support animal and microbial respiration. Low DO is a common cause of acute morbidity and mortality in fish, although species sensitivity varies (see Chapter C1). Adequate microbial respiration is essential for the biological filtration within a life support system. Since low DO can damage the microbial population supporting biological filtration, it can lead to increases in toxic nitrogenous wastes.

      Frequency of testing: DO should be assayed routinely where possible (e.g. daily). DO may be monitored continuously in intensive aquaculture systems or with sensitive species. At a minimum, baseline values should be obtained for each system. DO can vary across the year, particularly for surface water, so baselines should be established across all seasons. DO should be checked prior to and during any immersion treatment, restraint, or transport.

      Sampling: DO must be measured on site in the system. The result represents only that moment in time and values can change rapidly. DO should be measured in multiple locations, as it will vary with depth, water flow, and surface water agitation.

Advantages Disadvantages
Municipal water Availability Consistency Low risk of pathogens Usually high DO Usually low H2S and CO2 High chlorines and chloramines May have high nitrates, phosphates, or heavy metals Cost
Surface water Good conditions for endemic species Usually low H2S and CO2 Need to be physically close to the source Variable quality; changes may be seasonal High risk of pathogens High risk of toxins (e.g. harmful algal blooms, pesticides) High risk of turbidity
Ground water Consistency Low risk of pathogens Low risk of environmental pollutants Low risk of organic matter Variable availability Often low DO and supersaturated with N2 Often low pH and high CO2 Often low temperature Potentially high H2S and Fe

      CO2: carbon dioxide; DO: dissolved oxygen; Fe: iron; H2S: hydrogen sulfide; N2: nitrogen.

Photo depicts dissolved oxygen meter.

      Units: Oxygen is measured in milligrams per liter (mg/L), equivalent to parts per million (ppm). It is simultaneously reported as percentage saturation (%). This is because the amount required to saturate