Keith D. Dickson

American Civil War For Dummies


Скачать книгу

5-1 for the major resources of the Union and the Confederacy (excluding the Border States) in 1861. Without making too much of these statistics, some points need to be made. At first glance, the manpower resources of the North appear dominant. In actuality, the South had a slight strategic advantage. As an industrial society, a significant proportion of the North’s manpower was tied up in the factories. Also, many farmers needed to remain home to produce food, further cutting into the manpower pool. The three and a half million slaves in the South, a predominantly agricultural society, allowed white Southerners to serve in the army in far greater numbers, proportionately, than Northerners.

North South
Population
18.5 5.5 million 3.5 million (slaves)
Agricultural
Corn 396 280 millions of bushels
Wheat 114 31 millions of bushels
Oats 138 20 millions of bushels
Cotton 0 5 million bales
Tobacco 58 199 million pounds
Rice 0 187 million pounds
Animal Resources
Mules 330 800 thousand
Cows 5 2.7 million
Beef Cattle 5.4 7 million
Sheep 14 5 million
Hogs 11.3 15.5 million
Industrial Capacity
Railroad Mileage 20 9 thousand track miles
Number of Factories 100.5 20.6 thousand
Skilled Workers 1.1 million 111 thousand
Financial
Bank Deposits $189 million $47 million
Gold/Silver on Hand $45 million $27 million

      As the political leaders of each nation had made their determination to move toward war, they now had to huddle with their military advisors and determine how the military strategy would be shaped to support the overall political goals each president had defined for his nation.

      The Union’s strategy

      Based on the political objectives and the assessment of its resources, the Union had a simple military strategy: divide and conquer. Union armies would have to invade the Confederacy, split it in half, and capture and control its territory. General Winfield Scott, the commanding general of the U.S. Army, developed what was termed “the Anaconda Plan.” His strategy for defeating the Confederacy contained three objectives. The first goal of the strategy was to capture the Confederate capital at Richmond, Virginia, only 100 miles from Washington, D.C. The second goal was to strangle the Confederacy through the use of a blockade. This blockade would employ the U.S. Navy in a cordon around the 3,500-mile coastline of the Confederacy to prevent any seaborne commerce from entering or leaving Southern ports. The third part of the strategy was to advance down the Mississippi River, cut the Confederacy in half, and defeat its armies. It all looked good on paper, but the prospects of achieving these three goals were daunting.

      The Confederacy’s strategy

      Confederate military strategy can be stated in far simpler terms — survive. To win, the Union had to invade and attack Confederate resources and its military strength. By remaining on the strategic defensive, inflicting heavy losses on invading enemy armies, and protecting its critical weak points, the Confederacy could conserve its limited resources and simply hold out until the Union leaders gave up. If the Union did not give up easily, the Confederacy included as part of its strategy a plan to end the war through the intervention of a major European power on the Confederacy’s behalf. This scenario may sound familiar. It is the same strategy that won the 13 colonies their independence from Great Britain in the American Revolution, when France entered into an alliance with the Americans. Another option was to gain a decisive victory on the battlefield that would convince the Union to seek peace, or convince the Europeans that the Confederacy had the capability to survive as an independent country.

      In formulating these two strategies for the Union and the Confederacy, geography played an important role. The Confederacy’s land area of 750,000 square miles roughly equaled that of Europe, minus the Scandinavian countries. This is a huge area of land — extremely difficult to conquer and equally difficult to defend with limited resources. Geography in