Gerardus Blokdyk

Data Binding A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition


Скачать книгу

rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Data binding brings?

      <--- Score

      18. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      19. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      20. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      21. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Data binding changes?

      <--- Score

      22. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      23. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Data binding? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      24. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      25. Are accountability and ownership for Data binding clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      26. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      27. Do you have a Data binding success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      28. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      29. Will team members perform Data binding work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      30. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      31. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      32. Who are the Data binding improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      33. Who is gathering Data binding information?

      <--- Score

      34. Why are you doing Data binding and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      35. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      36. What sources do you use to gather information for a Data binding study?

      <--- Score

      37. Has a Data binding requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      38. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      39. Is there a clear Data binding case definition?

      <--- Score

      40. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      41. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      42. How did the Data binding manager receive input to the development of a Data binding improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      43. Is the scope of Data binding defined?

      <--- Score

      44. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      45. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      46. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      47. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      48. When is/was the Data binding start date?

      <--- Score

      49. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      50. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      51. What are the Data binding use cases?

      <--- Score

      52. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      53. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      54. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      55. Is special Data binding user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      56. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      57. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      58. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      59. How will the Data binding team and the group measure complete success of Data binding?

      <--- Score

      60. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      61. How have you defined all Data binding requirements first?

      <--- Score

      62. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      63. How does the Data binding manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      64. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      65. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      66. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you think the partners involved in Data binding would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      68. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Data binding work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      69. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Data binding?

      <--- Score

      70. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      71. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      72. What are the record-keeping requirements of Data binding activities?

      <--- Score

      73. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <---