must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
71. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
72. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
73. Will a Capability security production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
74. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
75. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
76. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
77. What Capability security requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
78. How does the Capability security manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
79. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
80. How do you manage unclear Capability security requirements?
<--- Score
81. Are improvement team members fully trained on Capability security?
<--- Score
82. What is the scope of the Capability security effort?
<--- Score
83. Are accountability and ownership for Capability security clearly defined?
<--- Score
84. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
85. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
86. How would you define Capability security leadership?
<--- Score
87. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
88. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
89. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
90. What is the scope of the Capability security work?
<--- Score
91. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
92. What sources do you use to gather information for a Capability security study?
<--- Score
93. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
94. What is the definition of Capability security excellence?
<--- Score
95. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Capability security goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
96. Is Capability security currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
97. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
98. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
99. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
100. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Capability security leverage and how?
<--- Score
101. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
102. What Capability security services do you require?
<--- Score
103. Is Capability security required?
<--- Score
104. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
105. When is/was the Capability security start date?
<--- Score
106. How will the Capability security team and the group measure complete success of Capability security?
<--- Score
107. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
108. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
109. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
110. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
111. Who approved the Capability security scope?
<--- Score
112. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
113. What are (control) requirements for Capability security Information?
<--- Score
114. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
115. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
116. Are the Capability security requirements complete?
<--- Score
117. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
118. Is there a critical path to deliver Capability security results?
<--- Score
119. Has a Capability security requirement not been met?
<--- Score
120. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
121. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
122. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
123. Is there a Capability security management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
124. Is the Capability security scope manageable?
<--- Score
125. What knowledge or experience