Gerardus Blokdyk

Human Language Technology A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition


Скачать книгу

linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      57. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      58. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      59. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      60. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Human language technology leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      61. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      62. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      63. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      64. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      65. Is the Human language technology scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      66. What system do you use for gathering Human language technology information?

      <--- Score

      67. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      68. Is Human language technology currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      69. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      70. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      71. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      72. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      73. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      74. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      75. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      76. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      77. Is there a critical path to deliver Human language technology results?

      <--- Score

      78. Are improvement team members fully trained on Human language technology?

      <--- Score

      79. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      80. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      81. Has a Human language technology requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      82. What Human language technology services do you require?

      <--- Score

      83. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      84. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      85. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      86. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      87. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      88. How do you think the partners involved in Human language technology would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      89. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      90. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Human language technology? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      91. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      92. How are consistent Human language technology definitions important?

      <--- Score

      93. Who is gathering Human language technology information?

      <--- Score

      94. Are stakeholder processes mapped?

      <--- Score

      95. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      96. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      97. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      98. What are the core elements of the Human language technology business case?

      <--- Score

      99. Are the Human language technology requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      100. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      101. When is/was the Human language technology start date?

      <--- Score

      102. Will a Human language technology production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      103. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      104. Who approved the Human language technology scope?

      <--- Score

      105. What Human language technology requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      106. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      107. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      108. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      109. Is Human language technology required?

      <--- Score

      110. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      111. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      112. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      113. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      114.