Группа авторов

Fish and Fisheries in Estuaries


Скачать книгу

(Morongiello et al. 2014) experience better recruitment under conditions of elevated precipitation and river discharge. However, effects of freshwater flow may be negative for other species (e.g. Ramos et al. 2006). Very high flows in small South African estuaries result in temporarily reduced abundances of recruiting marine (Whitfield & Harrison 2003) and estuarine‐resident species (Strydom et al. 2002). In the lateolabracid Lateolabrax japonicus, exceptionally high levels of river discharge reduce its recruitment levels in the Ariake Sea‐Chikugo River (Japan) estuary (Shoji et al. 2006). Other factors may interact with flow and precipitation. For example, larval recruitment of the pleuronectid Platichthys flesus to the Lima Estuary (Portugal) was strongly negatively related to coastal sea‐surface temperature, positively related to coastal chl‐a and weakly but positively related to precipitation and freshwater flow (Amorim et al. 2016).

      Air temperature during late winter is the primary environmental indicator of recruitment variability in spring‐spawning Clupea harengus in the Baltic Sea. Winter‐spring temperatures and other climate variables exercise control during the period of highest larval mortality, mainly by controlling production of planktonic prey (Ojaveer et al. 2011). The dependence of recruitment on spawning stock biomass (SSB) varies amongst years with differing temperature conditions. In years of cold winters, environmental conditions are the dominant factor controlling year‐class abundance of C. harengus, and spawning stock biomass is not important. In milder winters, the importance of spawning stock biomass increases and is significantly related to recruitment success.

      In another example, enhancement of anguillid eel recruitment under high‐flow conditions is especially evident for the glass‐eel stage of the catadromous Anguilla rostrata (Sullivan et al. 2006). Reduced freshwater discharge during droughts can diminish estuarine plumes and associated cues onto the continental shelf that may facilitate estuarine recruitment of fish larvae from offshore (Baptista et al. 2010). Some droughts can induce fish kills in estuarine nurseries, likely due to synergistic effects of hypoxia and resulting in diminished availability of food (Wetz et al. 2011). Effects of prolonged drought and its negative consequences for the nursery function and larval fish assemblages in the Murray‐Darling Estuary (Australia) have been documented (Bucater et al. 2013). Recruitments of pelagic fishes in the San Francisco Estuary (USA) are negatively impacted by years of prolonged drought (Sommers et al. 2007). Similarly, cessation of river flow into certain South African estuaries due to freshwater abstraction and the resultant loss of cues to the marine environment has been suggested as the major reason for reduced ingress and recruitment of estuary‐associated, marine postlarvae into such estuaries (Whitfield 1994).

      Establishing a relationship between adult spawners and numbers of recruits has been an objective of fishery scientists and managers for decades (Cushing 1981, Rothschild 1986, 2000, Subbey et al. 2014), primarily to support fishery management and to document the status and trends in stock trajectories. Gaining an understanding of recruitment variability, its causes and degree of dependence on adult stock abundance is important to evaluate a stock's production potential and, for exploited species, to manage its fisheries, including those for estuarine species. These efforts often are confounded by high inter‐annual variability in reproductive success that is attributed to unpredictable and changing environmental factors (Myers 1998) that mask relationships of recruitment to parent stock.

      While recruitment is often (usually) poorly related to adult stock, abundance and age structure of the spawning stock, especially at low stock abundance, can be a key factor controlling levels of recruitment (Myers 2001, Cury et al. 2014, Subbey et al. 2014, Houde 2016). Documenting a clear linkage between adult stock (numbers, biomass or fecundity) and recruit numbers has been elusive for most marine and estuarine species (Subbey et al. 2014, Szuwalski et al. 2015, Lowerre‐Barbieri et al. 2016, Somarakis et al. 2019, Sharma et al. 2019). In many cases, only at the lowest levels of adult stock abundance can recruitment be demonstrated to depend on spawner abundance or biomass (Hilborn & Walters 1992, Myers 2001). Furthermore, in many circumstances it is actually the abundance of adult stock that varies in its dependence on recruitment success (Szuwalski et al. 2015).

      Intensive research has been directed at explaining dependence of recruitment on adult stock in the decades following development of stock‐recruitment models (Ricker 1954, Beverton & Holt 1957, Rothschild 1986, Myers 2001, Subbey et al. 2014) and continuing to the present day (Szuwalski et al. 2015, Sharma et al. 2019). Substantial knowledge has accumulated on scales and causes of recruitment variability, the role of environmental factors, role of adult stock and age structure and the effects of fishing. Understanding the relationship of recruitment to adult stock is not unique to fishes in estuarine ecosystems, but explaining and understanding causes of variability may be exacerbated in estuaries where a multitude of environmental and anthropogenic factors, in addition to fishing, act to modify stock‐recruitment relationships.

       3.4.1 Adult stock