Группа авторов

Fish and Fisheries in Estuaries


Скачать книгу

https://dnr.maryland.gov/fisheries/Pages/striped‐bass/juvenile‐index.aspx).

upper R i c k e r left-parenthesis upper D o m e d upper C u r v e right-parenthesis upper R equals alpha upper P normal e Superscript minus beta upper P upper B e v e r t o n minus upper H o l t left-parenthesis upper A s y m p t o t i c upper C u r v e right-parenthesis upper R equals 1 slash left-parenthesis alpha plus beta slash upper P right-parenthesis

      where R is recruitment, P is adult stock, α is a density‐independent coefficient and β is a density‐dependent coefficient.

Image described by caption. Schematic illustration of stock and recruitment models for the sciaenid Micropogonias undulatus on the east coast of the USA showing the effects of spawning stock biomass and winter air temperature.

      (modified from Hare et al. (2010, their figure 1)).

      For the anadromous alosine Alosa sapidissima in the Connecticut River (USA), a Ricker model fitted to spawner abundance explained little of the observed recruitment variability (Crecco & Savoy 1984, Crecco et al. 1986). Including a freshwater‐discharge variable in the S‐R model improved the modelled result (r 2 increased from 0.02 to 0.26). This relationship, while still far from a reliable predictor of recruitment, convincingly indicated that freshwater discharge (in this case a negative factor) may control recruitment and, in many years, may be more important than abundance of adult spawners.

Schematic illustration of modified Ricker stock–recruitment model.

      (from Houde (2008, his figure 6)).