preprints”, eLife, vol. 8, p. e45133, available at: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45133, 2019.
[BAR 06] BARBOUR V., CHINNOCK P., COHEN B. et al., “The impact of open access upon public health”, Bulletin of World Health Organization, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 339–400, 2006.
[BOU 17a] BOUDRY C., DURAND-BARTHEZ M., “Publications en libre accès en biologie–médecine: Historique et état des lieux en 2016”, Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 169–181, 2017.
[BOU 17b] BOUKACEM-ZEGHMOURI C., CORDONNIER S., SPANO W. et al., “‘Publicize or Perish’: Nouvelles formes de circulation et d’évaluation des savoirs scientifiques sur le Web”, Les Cahiers de La SFSIC, no. 14, pp. 279–284, 2017.
[BOU 17c] BOUKACEM-ZEGHMOURI, C., NICHOLAS, D., “La vie en gold: Enjeux et risques pour les chercheurs”, I2D – Information, données & documents, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 10–11, 2017.
[BOU 19a] BOUKACEM-ZEGHMOURI C., RODRIGUEZ-BRAVO B., “L’information scientifique à l’épreuve de sa médiatisation”, Les Enjeux de l’information et de la communication, available at: https://lesenjeux.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/2019/articles-revue/dossier-2019-l-information-scientifique-a-l-epreuve-de-sa-mediatisation/, 2019.
[BOU 19b] BOUKACEM-ZEGHMOURI C., BERTHAUD, C., “The stakes of repositories and bibliodiversity: Community approaches”, ELPUB 2019 23rd Edition of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Marseille, France, June 2019.
[BRA 20] BRAINARD J., “Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers. Can new tools keep them afloat?”, Science, available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc7839, 13 May 2020.
[BUT 17] BUTLER D., “Gates foundation announces open-access publishing venture”, Nature, vol. 543, no. 7647, p. 599, 2017.
[CAM 18] CAMACHO M., RECKLEY, L.K., “Predatory journals: Enough is enough”, Laryngoscope, vol. 128, no. 7, p. 1510, available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27178, 2018.
[CIT 13] CITTON Y., “Économie de l’attention et nouvelles exploitations numériques”, Multitudes, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 163–175, 2013.
[COB 18] COBEY K.D., LALU M.M., SKIDMORE B. et al., “What is a predatory journal? A scoping review”, F1000Research, available at: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15256.2, 2018.
[COL 20] COLAVIZZA G., COSTAS R., TRAAG V.A. et al., “A scientometric overview of CORD-19”, bioRxiv, available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.20.046144, 2020.
[DIL 18] DILLAERTS H., “Paysage de l’Open Access: Complexité et hybridation des modèles de publication et de communication scientifique”, URFIST de Rennes, available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13_T-bvDwO-UiH86o7lqHJtAcDaStEv2K/view, 2018.
[ELS 18] ELSE H., “Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions”, Nature, available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06178-7, 4 September 2018.
[ELS 19] ELSE H., “How to bring preprints to the charged field of medicine”, Nature, available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01806-2, 6 June 2019.
[FIN 12] FINCH J., Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: How to expand access to research publications, Report, Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, RIN, 2012.
[FRY 11] FRY J., PROBETS S., CREASER C. et al., PEER behavioural research: Authors and users vis-à-vis journals and repositories. Final report, available at: http://www.peerproject.eu/fileadmin/media/reports/Final_revision_-_behavioural_baseline_report_-_20_01_10.pdf, 2011.
[FU 19] FU D.U., HUGHEY J.J., “Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article”, eLife, available at: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52646, 2019.
[GIN 97] GINSPARG P., “Winners and losers in the global research village”, The Serials Librarian, vol. 1997, nos 3–4, pp. 83–95, 1997.
[GIN 18] GINGRAS Y., “Les transformations de la production du savoir: De l’unité de connaissance à l’unité comptable”, Zilsel, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 139–152, available at: https://doi.org/10.3917/zil.004.0139, 2018.
[GRU 19] GRUDNIEWICZ A., MOHER D., COBEY K.D. et al., “Predatory journals: No definition, no defence”, Nature, vol. 576, pp. 210–212, 2019.
[HOP 19] HOPF H., KRIEF A., MEHTA G. et al., “Fake science and the knowledge crisis: Ignorance can be fatal”, Royal Society Open Science, vol. 6, no. 5, available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190161, 2019.
[HOR 20] HORBACH S., “Pandemic publishing: Medical journals drastically speed up their publication process for Covid-19”, bioRxiv, available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.18.045963, 2020.
[JOH 18] JOHNSON R., WATKINSON A., MABE M., The STM Report. An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Publishing: 1968–2018, International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, The Hague, 2018.
[KIR 20] KIRKHAM J.J., PENFOLD N., MURPHY F. et al., “A systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting”, bioRxiv, available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.27.063578, 2020.
[KOU 20] KOUSHA K., THELWALL M., “COVID-19 publications: Database coverage, citations, readers, tweets, news, Facebook walls, Reddit posts”, Arxiv (pre-print), available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2004/2004.10400.pdf, 2020.
[LAR 18] LARIVIÈRE V., SUGIMOTO C.R., “Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research?”, Nature, available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w, 24 October 2018.
[MIR 18] MIROWSKI P., “The future(s) of open science”, Social Studies of Science, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 171–203, available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086, 2018.
[MOM 03] MOMEN M., “Equitable access to scientific and technical information for health”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 81, no. 10, p. 700, available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2572335/, 2003.
[MOO 15] MOORHEAD L.L., HOZMEYER C., MAGGIO L.A. et al., “In an age of open access to research policies: Physician and public health NGO staff research use and policy awareness”, PLOS ONE, vol. 10, no. 7, available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129708,