exchange takes place using a Grignard reagent [169].
Scheme 1.25 Use of ate complex t‐Bu3ZnLi 65 as a solid‐phase metalating agent.
1.4 Deprotonation Using Ate Complexes
1.4.1 Introduction
Lithium amides have been extensively studied [170] and the potential of metal amides in synthesis is well understood [171]. However, the susceptibility of many DMGs to nucleophilic attack, even in the presence of amides [172, 173], has meant that sterically demanding reagents have necessarily come to the fore. Indeed, sterically cumbersome LTMP has been used for the directed ortho‐lithiation of arylcarboxylic esters. However, unwanted condensation between the aryllithium intermediate and electrophilic directing groups has still been known to occur during metalation [12]. These formative ideas were, however, used in attempts to develop new chemoselective metalating agents capable of the deprotonative reaction – zincation in the first instance – of functionalized aromatics and heteroaromatics. The early research in this area led to TMP‐zincate reagents being developed as outlined below [174, 175].
1.4.2 Zincates
The first reported TMP‐zincate, t‐Bu2Zn(TMP)Li 1, was targeted on account of the nontransferability of its tert‐butyl groups [89]. It was prepared by adding t‐Bu2Zn to a solution of LTMP in THF at −78 °C, whereupon the complex solution was allowed to warm to room temperature (Scheme 1.26). 13C NMR spectroscopy revealed a new set of signals that could not be attributed to either t‐Bu2Zn or LTMP, suggesting the formation of an ate complex. No spectroscopic indications of decomposition were detected after several hours at room temperature, suggesting the reagent to be suitably robust for further application.
The ortho‐metalation of arenes with different DMGs was examined using a solution of the TMP‐zincate complex. First, the reaction of alkyl benzoates with this reagent was investigated, with metalation found to proceed smoothly at room temperature. The putative arylzincates thus prepared were treated with I2 to give iodobenzoates in excellent yields. Substantiation of arylzincate intermediate formation came from the stepwise treatment of alkyl benzoates with LTMP followed by the addition of t‐Bu2Zn. This was found to be an ineffective route to the formation of the arylzincates; pre‐complexation of the Li and Zn reagents was evidently essential for successful zincation. N,N‐diisopropylbenzamide was also metalated by the TMP‐zincate, and subsequent treatment with I2 gave the iodide. The cyano group also functioned as an excellent DMG, and metalation proceeded smoothly. The arylzincate could be trapped with I2 or benzaldehyde to give excellent yields of the iodide or alcohol, respectively. This arylzincate preparation was applied to biaryl synthesis, employing palladium‐catalyzed cross‐coupling with aryl iodides. The arylzincate derived from ethyl benzoate and TMP‐zincate was reacted with iodobenzene and 3‐iodopyridine in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 at room temperature for 24 h to give biarylcarboxylates (Scheme 1.27).
The metalation of a range of heteroaromatic compounds at diverse ring positions was examined using 1. For example, just as ethyl 3‐thiophenecarboxylate has been metalated at the 2‐position using magnesium amides [38, 39], so too was this deprotonation achieved at room temperature using a zincate base, after which treatment with I2 gave the 2‐iodo derivative in 89% yield [174]. A similar reaction using ethyl 2‐thiophenecarboxylate gave presumed 123 and thence the 5‐iododerivative in 62% yield (Figure 1.17). Ethyl 2‐furancarboxylate showed different regioselectivity (viz. 124) from that of ethyl 2‐thiophenecarboxylate, and 3‐iodo derivative was obtained in 71% yield. α‐Metalation of π‐deficient heteroaromatic compounds – considered to be a challenging target – has been investigated as part of the search for more efficient, direct methods for introducing functionalities into heteroaromatic rings. Controlling the reactivity and selectivity of the metalating species has been one of the most important and essential issues in developing this approach, and this work acted to demonstrate the versatility of the TMP‐zincate. The α‐metalation of pyridine was found to proceed smoothly at room temperature, and the putative pyridinylzincate 125 was treated with I2 to give 2‐iodopyridine in 76% yield. Interestingly, quinoline was metalated preferentially at the 8‐position, and treatment with I2 gave 8‐iodoquinoline in 61% yield (together with α‐metalated 2‐iodoquinoline in 26% yield). Isoquinoline was also easily metalated at the 1‐position (putatively 126), and 1‐iodoisoquinoline was obtained in 93% yield (Figure 1.17). This contrasted with the directed 1‐lithiation of isoquinoline, which is difficult to accomplish on account of the formation of isoquinoline dimers [176].
Scheme 1.26 Synthesis oft‐Bu2Zn(TMP)Li 1.
Scheme 1.27 Application of 1 in biaryl synthesis.
Figure 1.17 Proposed intermediates in the metalation of selected heteroaromatics.
Since the advent of directed aromatic deprotometalation using 1 [174], efforts have been ongoing to establish in detail the nature of potential intermediates in this process. This has led to extensive structural studies that will be visited throughout this book. To summarize, however, the earliest work focused on the nature of so‐called synergic bases themselves and rapidly established the predominance of a metallacyclic core based on the ability of the amido ligand and one of the two alkyl groups (in the case of Zn) to chelate the alkali metal irrespective of the presence of coordinating solvents or reagents [177]. The alkali metal can be a higher group 1 element such as sodium [178] or even potassium [179, 180], though the use of lithium has dominated synthetically applied work [82]. Representative examples that have been fully elucidated crystallographically include Et2Zn(TMP)Li 127 and t‐Bu2Zn(TMP)Li(TMEDA) 128. They are based on 4‐membered NZnCLi metallacyclic cores deriving from the intermetal bridging ability of TMP and one of the two alkyl groups (e.g. Figure 1.18). Theirs and closely related single‐crystal structures are explored in detail in Chapter 2, Figures 2.13 and 2.14.
More instructive in terms of understanding deprotometalation, have been investigations into model intermediates that have incorporated simple aromatics. An early example of this involved the reaction of anisole, with