St Mary’s in Litchfield, and Eliz’th Porter of ye parish of St Phillip in Burmingham.’ Notes and Queries, 4th S. vi. 44. At the time of their marriage, therefore, she was forty-six, and Johnson only two months short of twenty-six.
[290] The author of the Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Dr. Johnson, 1785, p. 25, says:—‘Mrs. Porter’s husband died insolvent, but her settlement was secured. She brought her second husband about seven or eight hundred pounds, a great part of which was expended in fitting up a house for a boarding-school.’ That she had some money can be almost inferred from what we are told by Boswell and Hawkins. How otherwise was Johnson able to hire and furnish a large house for his school? Boswell says that he had but three pupils. Hawkins gives him a few more. ‘His number,’ he writes (p. 36) ‘at no time exceeded eight, and of those not all were boarders.’ After nearly twenty months of married life, when he went to London, ‘he had,’ Boswell says, ‘a little money.’ It was not till a year later still that he began to write for the Gent. Mag. If Mrs. Johnson had not money, how did she and her husband live from July 1735 to the spring of 1738? It could scarcely have been on the profits made from their school. Inference, however, is no longer needful, as there is positive evidence. Mr. Timmins in his Dr. Johnson in Birmingham (p. 4) writes:—‘My friend, Mr. Joseph Hill, says, A copy of an old deed which has recently come into my hands, shews that a hundred pounds of Mrs. Johnson’s fortune was left in the hands of a Birmingham attorney named Thomas Perks, who died insolvent; and in 1745, a bulky deed gave his creditors 7_s_. 4_d_. in the pound. Among the creditors for £100 were “Samuel Johnson, gent., and Elizabeth his wife, executors of the last will and testament of Harry Porter, late of Birmingham aforesaid, woollen draper, deceased.” Johnson and his wife were almost the only creditors who did not sign the deed, their seals being left void. It is doubtful, therefore, whether they ever obtained the amount of the composition £36 13_s_. 4_d_.’
[291] Sir Walter Scott has recorded Lord Auchinleck’s ‘sneer of most sovereign contempt,’ while he described Johnson as ‘a dominie, monan auld dominie; he keeped a schule, and cau’d it an acaadamy.’ Croker’s Boswell, p. 397, note.
[292] ‘Edial is two miles west of Lichfield.’ Harwood’s Lichfield, p. 564.
[293] Johnson in more than one passage in his writings seems to have in mind his own days as a schoolmaster. Thus in the Life of Milton he says:—‘This is the period of his life from which all his biographers seem inclined to shrink. They are unwilling that Milton should be degraded to a schoolmaster; but, since it cannot be denied that he taught boys, one finds out that he taught for nothing, and another that his motive was only zeal for the propagation of learning and virtue; and all tell what they do not know to be true, only to excuse an act which no wise man will consider as in itself disgraceful. His father was alive; his allowance was not ample; and he supplied its deficiencies by an honest and useful employment.’ Johnson’s Works, vii. 75. In the Life of Blackmore he says:—‘In some part of his life, it is not known when, his indigence compelled him to teach a school, an humiliation with which, though it certainly lasted but a little while, his enemies did not forget to reproach him, when he became conspicuous enough to excite malevolence; and let it be remembered for his honour, that to have been once a schoolmaster is the only reproach which all the perspicacity of malice, animated by wit, has ever fixed upon his private life.’ Johnson’s Works, viii. 36.
[294] In the original To teach. Seasons, Spring, l. 1149, Thomson is speaking, not of masters, but of parents.
[295] In the Life of Milton, Johnson records his own experience. ‘Every man that has ever undertaken to instruct others can tell what slow advances he has been able to make, and how much patience it requires to recall vagrant inattention, to stimulate sluggish indifference, and to rectify absurd misapprehension.’ Johnson’s Works, vii. 76.
[296]
‘As masters fondly soothe their boys to read With cakes and sweetmeats.’
Francis, Hor. i. Sat. I. 25.
[297] As Johnson kept Garrick much in awe when present, David, when his back was turned, repaid the restraint with ridicule of him and his dulcinea, which should be read with great abatement. PERCY. He was not consistent in his account, for ‘he told Mrs. Thrale that she was a little painted puppet of no value at all.’ ‘He made out,’ Mrs. Piozzi continues, ‘some comical scenes, by mimicking her in a dialogue he pretended to have overheard. I do not know whether he meant such stuff to be believed or no, it was so comical. The picture I found of her at Lichfield was very pretty, and her daughter said it was like. Mr. Johnson has told me that her hair was eminently beautiful, quite blonde like that of a baby.’ Piozzi’s Anec. p. 148.
[298] Mr. Croker points out that in this paper ‘there are two separate schemes, the first for a school—the second for the individual studies of some young friend.’
[299] In the Rambler, No. 122, Johnson, after stating that ‘it is observed that our nation has been hitherto remarkably barren of historical genius,’ praises Knolles, who, he says, ‘in his History of the Turks, has displayed all the excellencies that narration can admit.’
[300] Both of them used to talk pleasantly of this their first journey to London. Garrick, evidently meaning to embellish a little, said one day in my hearing, ‘we rode and tied.’ And the Bishop of Killaloe informed me, that at another time, when Johnson and Garrick were dining together in a pretty large company, Johnson humorously ascertaining the chronology of something, expressed himself thus: ‘that was the year when I came to London with twopence half-penny in my pocket.’ Garrick overhearing him, exclaimed, ‘eh? what do you say? with twopence half-penny in your pocket?’—JOHNSON, ‘Why yes; when I came with twopence half-penny in my pocket, and thou, Davy, with three half-pence in thine.’ BOSWELL.
[301] See Gent. Mag., xxiv. 333.
[302] Mr. Colson was First Master of the Free School at Rochester. In 1739 he was appointed Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge. MALONE. Mrs. Piozzi (Anec. p. 49) says that ‘by Gelidus the philosopher (Rambler, No. 24), Johnson meant to represent Colson.’
[303] This letter is printed in the Garrick Corres. i. 2. There we read I doubt not.
[304] One curious anecdote was communicated by himself to Mr. John Nichols. Mr. Wilcox, the bookseller, on being informed by him that his intention was to get his livelihood as an authour, eyed his robust frame attentively, and with a significant look, said, ‘You had better buy a porter’s knot.’ He however added, ‘Wilcox was one of my best friends.’ BOSWELL. Hawkins (Life, p. 43) states that Johnson and Garrick had soon exhausted their small stock of money in London, and that on Garrick’s suggestion they applied for a loan to Wilcox, of whom he had a slight knowledge. ‘Representing themselves to him, as they really were, two young men, friends and travellers from the same place, and just arrived with a view to settle here, he was so moved with their artless tale, that on their joint note he advanced them all that their modesty would permit them to ask (five pounds), which was soon after punctually repaid.’ Perhaps Johnson was thinking of himself when he recorded the advice given by Cibber to Fenton, ‘When the tragedy of Mariamne was shewn to Cibber, it was rejected by him, with the additional insolence of advising Fenton to engage himself in some employment of honest labour, by which he might obtain that support which he could never hope from his poetry. The play was acted at the other theatre; and the brutal petulance of Cibber was confuted, though perhaps not shamed, by general applause.’ Johnson’s Works, viii. 56. Adam Smith in the Wealth of Nations (Book i. ch. 2) says that ‘the difference between the most dissimilar characters, between a philosopher and a common street-porter, for example, seems to arise not so much from nature, as from habit, custom, and education.’ Wilcox’s shop was in Little Britain. Benjamin Franklin, in 1725, lodged next door to him. ‘He had,’ says Franklin (Memoirs, i. 64), ‘an immense collection of second-hand books. Circulating libraries were not then in use; but we agreed that on certain reasonable terms I might read any of his books.’
[305] Bernard Lintot (post,