when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
55. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
56. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
57. What would happen if Microsoft Exchange Server weren’t done?
<--- Score
58. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Microsoft Exchange Server delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
59. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Microsoft Exchange Server?
<--- Score
60. What are the expected benefits of Microsoft Exchange Server to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
61. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
62. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
63. Have you identified your Microsoft Exchange Server key performance indicators?
<--- Score
64. What Microsoft Exchange Server events should you attend?
<--- Score
65. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
66. What are the Microsoft Exchange Server resources needed?
<--- Score
67. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
68. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
69. Does your organization need more Microsoft Exchange Server education?
<--- Score
70. When a Microsoft Exchange Server manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
71. Are there Microsoft Exchange Server problems defined?
<--- Score
72. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
73. How do you assess your Microsoft Exchange Server workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
74. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Microsoft Exchange Server project?
<--- Score
75. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
76. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
77. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
78. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
79. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
80. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
81. Think about the people you identified for your Microsoft Exchange Server project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
82. Do you really need a reverse proxy server for your Exchange environment?
<--- Score
83. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
84. Which information does the Microsoft Exchange Server business case need to include?
<--- Score
85. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
86. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
87. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
88. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
89. Will Microsoft Exchange Server deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
90. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
91. Is the events server connection correct in the managed server?
<--- Score
92. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Microsoft Exchange Server will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
93. What Microsoft Exchange Server coordination do you need?
<--- Score
94. Are there recognized Microsoft Exchange Server problems?
<--- Score
95. What situation(s) led to this Microsoft Exchange Server Self Assessment?
<--- Score
96. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
97. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Microsoft Exchange Server Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How did the Microsoft Exchange Server manager receive input to the development of a Microsoft Exchange Server improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
2. How do you think the partners involved in Microsoft Exchange Server would have defined success?
<--- Score
3. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
4. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
5. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Microsoft Exchange Server