you catch System justification definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
63. How do you think the partners involved in System justification would have defined success?
<--- Score
64. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
65. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
66. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
67. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on System justification?
<--- Score
68. Do you have a System justification success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
69. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
70. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
71. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
72. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
73. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
74. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
75. When is/was the System justification start date?
<--- Score
76. Is the System justification scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
77. What are the System justification tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
78. Has a System justification requirement not been met?
<--- Score
79. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
80. Who is gathering System justification information?
<--- Score
81. What System justification requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
82. Have all basic functions of System justification been defined?
<--- Score
83. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
84. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
85. Will a System justification production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
86. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
87. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
88. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
89. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
90. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
91. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
92. Who approved the System justification scope?
<--- Score
93. What are the record-keeping requirements of System justification activities?
<--- Score
94. Has the System justification work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
95. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
96. Is System justification currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
97. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
98. Are accountability and ownership for System justification clearly defined?
<--- Score
99. How do you hand over System justification context?
<--- Score
100. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
101. What gets examined?
<--- Score
102. Is there a System justification management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
103. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
104. What System justification services do you require?
<--- Score
105. What happens if System justification’s scope changes?
<--- Score
106. Is the scope of System justification defined?
<--- Score
107. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
108. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
109. How does the System justification manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
110. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
111. What is the context?
<--- Score
112. What was the context?
<--- Score
113. Is there any additional System justification definition of success?
<--- Score
114. How did the System justification manager receive input to the development of a System justification improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
115. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
116. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
117. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
118.