Score
102. How does the Design Engineering and Construction Services manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
103. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
104. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
105. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
106. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
107. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
108. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
109. What Design Engineering and Construction Services requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
110. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
111. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
112. Is there a critical path to deliver Design Engineering and Construction Services results?
<--- Score
113. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
114. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
115. What is the definition of Design Engineering and Construction Services excellence?
<--- Score
116. How did the Design Engineering and Construction Services manager receive input to the development of a Design Engineering and Construction Services improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
117. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
118. Has the Design Engineering and Construction Services work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
119. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Design Engineering and Construction Services brings?
<--- Score
120. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
121. How do you think the partners involved in Design Engineering and Construction Services would have defined success?
<--- Score
122. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
123. When is/was the Design Engineering and Construction Services start date?
<--- Score
124. Are accountability and ownership for Design Engineering and Construction Services clearly defined?
<--- Score
125. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Design Engineering and Construction Services goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
126. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
127. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
128. Are the Design Engineering and Construction Services requirements complete?
<--- Score
129. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
130. Is Design Engineering and Construction Services currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
131. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
132. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Design Engineering and Construction Services?
<--- Score
133. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
134. What is in scope?
<--- Score
135. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Design Engineering and Construction Services Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
2. At what cost?
<--- Score
3. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
4. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
5. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
6. How are you verifying it?
<--- Score
7. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
8. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
9. What are the costs of delaying Design Engineering and Construction Services action?
<--- Score
10. Does the Design Engineering and Construction Services task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
11. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
12. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?
<--- Score
13. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
14. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
15. What potential environmental factors impact the Design Engineering and Construction Services effort?
<--- Score
16.