high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
63. Is there a Virtual operating system management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
64. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Virtual operating system work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
65. How do you manage unclear Virtual operating system requirements?
<--- Score
66. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
67. Is Virtual operating system required?
<--- Score
68. Will team members perform Virtual operating system work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
69. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
70. What would be the goal or target for a Virtual operating system’s improvement team?
<--- Score
71. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
72. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
73. Is the Virtual operating system scope manageable?
<--- Score
74. How do you gather Virtual operating system requirements?
<--- Score
75. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
76. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
77. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
78. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
79. Have all basic functions of Virtual operating system been defined?
<--- Score
80. How do you catch Virtual operating system definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
81. Will a Virtual operating system production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
82. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
83. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Virtual operating system? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
84. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
85. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
86. How does the Virtual operating system manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
87. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
88. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
89. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
90. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
91. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
92. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
93. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
94. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
95. Has a Virtual operating system requirement not been met?
<--- Score
96. Is the scope of Virtual operating system defined?
<--- Score
97. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Virtual operating system goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
98. How do you think the partners involved in Virtual operating system would have defined success?
<--- Score
99. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
100. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
101. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Virtual operating system changes?
<--- Score
102. Will team members regularly document their Virtual operating system work?
<--- Score
103. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
104. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
105. What are the record-keeping requirements of Virtual operating system activities?
<--- Score
106. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
107. Is there any additional Virtual operating system definition of success?
<--- Score
108. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
109. How can the value of Virtual operating system be defined?
<--- Score
110. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
111. Do you have a Virtual operating system success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
112. What is the context?
<--- Score
113. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
114. Is special Virtual operating system user knowledge required?
<--- Score
115. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
116. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
117. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<---