involved in Programmable system on a chip would have defined success?
<--- Score
4. How are consistent Programmable system on a chip definitions important?
<--- Score
5. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
6. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
7. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
8. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
9. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
10. What are the record-keeping requirements of Programmable system on a chip activities?
<--- Score
11. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
12. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
13. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Programmable system on a chip leverage and how?
<--- Score
14. How do you hand over Programmable system on a chip context?
<--- Score
15. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
16. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
17. Why are you doing Programmable system on a chip and what is the scope?
<--- Score
18. What are the Programmable system on a chip use cases?
<--- Score
19. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
20. How do you catch Programmable system on a chip definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
21. What are the core elements of the Programmable system on a chip business case?
<--- Score
22. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
23. Is there a critical path to deliver Programmable system on a chip results?
<--- Score
24. How do you gather Programmable system on a chip requirements?
<--- Score
25. Are the Programmable system on a chip requirements testable?
<--- Score
26. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
27. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
28. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
29. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Programmable system on a chip? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
30. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
31. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
32. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
33. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
34. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
35. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
36. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
37. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
38. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Programmable system on a chip goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
39. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
40. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
41. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Programmable system on a chip results are met?
<--- Score
42. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
43. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
44. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
45. Are improvement team members fully trained on Programmable system on a chip?
<--- Score
46. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
47. Is there any additional Programmable system on a chip definition of success?
<--- Score
48. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
49. What system do you use for gathering Programmable system on a chip information?
<--- Score
50. What would be the goal or target for a Programmable system on a chip’s improvement team?
<--- Score
51. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Programmable system on a chip changes?
<--- Score
52. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
53. What is the definition of Programmable system on a chip excellence?
<--- Score
54. Is the Programmable system on a chip scope manageable?
<--- Score
55. How will the Programmable system on a chip team and the group measure complete success of Programmable system on a chip?
<--- Score
56. Are different versions