you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
59. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
60. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
61. What is the extent or complexity of the System Design Review problem?
<--- Score
62. Are there recognized System Design Review problems?
<--- Score
63. What System Design Review events should you attend?
<--- Score
64. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
65. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
66. What vendors make products that address the System Design Review needs?
<--- Score
67. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
68. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
69. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
70. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
71. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
72. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the System Design Review team, System Design Review itself?
<--- Score
73. Have you identified your System Design Review key performance indicators?
<--- Score
74. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
75. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
76. Who needs to know about System Design Review?
<--- Score
77. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
78. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
79. What information do users need?
<--- Score
80. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective System Design Review leader?
<--- Score
81. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
82. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
83. What does System Design Review success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
84. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
85. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
86. Are there System Design Review problems defined?
<--- Score
87. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
88. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
89. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
90. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
91. How do you assess your System Design Review workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
92. When a System Design Review manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
93. How do you recognize an System Design Review objection?
<--- Score
94. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
95. Consider your own System Design Review project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
96. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
97. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
98. For your System Design Review project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
99. Does System Design Review create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
100. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the System Design Review Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How are consistent System Design Review definitions important?
<--- Score
2. How do you manage unclear System Design Review requirements?
<--- Score
3. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
4. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
5. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
6. Are the System Design Review requirements complete?
<--- Score
7. How would you define System Design Review leadership?
<--- Score
8. What sources do you use to