Is the scope of Software Performance Engineering defined?
<--- Score
116. What are the Software Performance Engineering tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
117. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Software Performance Engineering brings?
<--- Score
118. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
119. Do you all define Software Performance Engineering in the same way?
<--- Score
120. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
121. Will team members perform Software Performance Engineering work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
122. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
123. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
124. How did the Software Performance Engineering manager receive input to the development of a Software Performance Engineering improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
125. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
126. Are the Software Performance Engineering requirements testable?
<--- Score
127. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
128. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Software Performance Engineering results are met?
<--- Score
129. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
130. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
131. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
132. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
133. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Software Performance Engineering leverage and how?
<--- Score
134. Has the Software Performance Engineering work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
135. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
136. Are accountability and ownership for Software Performance Engineering clearly defined?
<--- Score
137. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
138. Are improvement team members fully trained on Software Performance Engineering?
<--- Score
139. How have you defined all Software Performance Engineering requirements first?
<--- Score
140. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
141. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Software Performance Engineering work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Software Performance Engineering Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Do you have any cost Software Performance Engineering limitation requirements?
<--- Score
2. What are the costs?
<--- Score
3. Have you included everything in your Software Performance Engineering cost models?
<--- Score
4. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
5. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
6. At what cost?
<--- Score
7. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
8. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
9. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
10. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
11. Does the Software Performance Engineering task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
12. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
13. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
14. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
15. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
16. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
17. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
18. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
19. What are your key Software Performance Engineering organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
20. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
21. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
22. How are measurements made?