Score
4. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
5. What is the scope of Human language technology?
<--- Score
6. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Human language technology changes?
<--- Score
7. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Human language technology brings?
<--- Score
8. Do you have a Human language technology success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
9. Is there a Human language technology management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
10. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
11. What is the scope of the Human language technology effort?
<--- Score
12. What happens if Human language technology’s scope changes?
<--- Score
13. What are (control) requirements for Human language technology Information?
<--- Score
14. How did the Human language technology manager receive input to the development of a Human language technology improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
15. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
16. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
17. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Human language technology work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
18. What are the Human language technology tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
19. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
20. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Human language technology?
<--- Score
21. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
22. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
23. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
24. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
25. How will the Human language technology team and the group measure complete success of Human language technology?
<--- Score
26. What gets examined?
<--- Score
27. Has the Human language technology work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
28. How does the Human language technology manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
29. Why are you doing Human language technology and what is the scope?
<--- Score
30. Do you all define Human language technology in the same way?
<--- Score
31. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
32. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
33. How can the value of Human language technology be defined?
<--- Score
34. How do you gather Human language technology requirements?
<--- Score
35. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Human language technology results are met?
<--- Score
36. Is special Human language technology user knowledge required?
<--- Score
37. Have all basic functions of Human language technology been defined?
<--- Score
38. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
39. Are the Human language technology requirements testable?
<--- Score
40. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
41. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Human language technology goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
42. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
43. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
44. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
45. What sources do you use to gather information for a Human language technology study?
<--- Score
46. Is the scope of Human language technology defined?
<--- Score
47. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
48. Who are the Human language technology improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
49. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
50. Will team members perform Human language technology work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
51. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
52. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
53. How would you define Human language technology leadership?
<--- Score
54. How do you manage unclear Human language technology requirements?
<--- Score
55. Are accountability and ownership for Human language technology clearly defined?
<--- Score
56. Is Human