Sindo Kou

Welding Metallurgy


Скачать книгу

in addition to shallow penetration, (c) (d) dγ /dT gtgtgt 0 can cause convex pool surface, weak pool-surface oscillation near edge and much less clear ripples in addition to deep penetration."/>

      Source: Kou, Limmaneevitchitr, Wei [32]. Welding Journal, December 2011, © American Welding Society.

Schematic illustration of the transverse cross-sections of 304 stainless steel welds showing (a) 42 ppm S without flux, (b) 42 ppm S with active flux, (c) 140 ppm S without flux, (d) 140 ppm S with active flux.

      Source: Yu and Kou [59].

      Howse and Lucus [56] observed that the arc becomes more constricted when a flux is used. Consequently, they proposed that the deeper penetration is caused by arc constriction and that the vaporized flux constricts the arc by capturing electrons in the cooler outer region of the arc. For the same welding current, the more the arc is constricted, the greater the Lorentz force (F in Figure 3.15c) and deeper penetration.

      Tanaka et al. [57], however, proposed that the oxygen from the oxide‐containing flux causes an inward surface flow and hence a deeper penetration. They GTA welded a 304 stainless steel containing little (0.002 wt%) S, with He for shielding and TiO2 as the flux. They observed both an inward surface flow and a significant decrease in the surface tension when the flux is used. As mentioned previously, ∂γ/∂T can become positive and cause inward surface flow in the presence of a surface‐active agent such as oxygen. They observed a steep temperature gradient across the pool surface caused by the inward surface flow. Spectroscopic analysis of the arc showed that the blue luminous plasma appears to be mainly composed of metal vapor (Cr, Fe, etc.) from the weld pool. The steeper temperature gradient across the smaller pool surface suggests a more localized metal evaporation and hence a more constricted arc, which also help increase the penetration.

      Wei et al. [60] pioneered the computer simulation of heat transfer and fluid flow in RSW. They further conducted a series of fundamental studies that better explained RSW [61–65], such as the effect of the magnetic properties of the workpiece, the contact resistance at the faying surface, the electrode‐workpiece interfaces, and the geometry of the electrode. Their studies can be a useful tool for further understanding of heat transfer and fluid flow in RSW without or with an externally applied magnetic field [66–70].

Schematic illustration of the resistance spot welding and MA-RSW: (a) Resistance Spot Welding, (b) MA-RSW, (c) magnetic field and Lorentz force in FSW, (d) magnetic field and Lorentz force in MA-FSW.

      Source: Yao, Luo, Li, Yan, and Duan [66]. © Elsevier.

Schematic illustration of the calculated results of MA-RSW: (a) velocity field at time = 0.35 s, (b) flow loops illustrating velocity field in (a), (c) temperature field at time = 0.35 s.

      Source: Li, Lin, Shen, and Lai [67]. © Wiley.