Steve Vanderheiden

Environmental Political Theory


Скачать книгу

ideas and ideals can return over time to those places and peoples that repudiated them, giving new life to the aspirations that they enable.

      As climatic changes shift disease vectors and induce species migration through changes to habitats, creating new assemblages of species that allow some to prosper, others to die off, and new hybrids or adaptations to appear, so also with ideas and ideals that are shifted by environmental change. Species adapt to changes in their environment, whether through developing productive forms of resilience or through decline and extinction, but do so without the mediation of disruption to and transformation of their ideas about the world and ideals that orient them to it. Humans also adapt – whether successfully or not in developing resilience against environmental change – through their ideas and ideals, and only then through their institutions, material relationships, and social practices.

      Understanding the planet that we inhabit and the changes that we have brought about, and must therefore adapt to, requires our catching a glimpse of the world in deep or geologic time. The natural scientist learns to see the world in this way, then – like the philosopher returning to the cave in Plato’s Republic – helps the rest of us see a bit of what this perspective offers. Empirical social scientists sometimes view the world in what Stephen Skowronek calls political time,6 understanding change scaled to decades or centuries of human history rather than millennia of earth systems history, and gleaning insights that would not be available to those of us experiencing a world of more limited time horizons.

      With the emergence of the environmental crisis (discussed further in chapter 2), many of our received social and political ideals face profound challenges in accommodating new facts such as ecological limits to growth, or new kinds of transnational and intergenerational threats such as climate change. The existence of ecological limits to growth, along with the real possibility of approaching or transgressing such limits within our lifetimes, appeared as the kind of event or scientific discovery that would disrupt many of our received ideas and ideals. Not only could economic growth no longer feasibly be taken as an indicator of social progress (as discussed in chapter 5), but the crisis associated with the planet’s finite ability to generate the ecological goods and services upon which human societies and their normative aspirations depend now requires a broader reassessment of the role that social and political ideals, such as liberty and equality or democracy, play in orienting collective life. Long-settled norms of sovereignty are challenged as the system of states or resistance to international cooperation in protecting the global environment is viewed as a possible contributor to the environmental crisis. Conventional assumptions about agency and responsibility appear ill equipped to grapple with some drivers of environmental degradation or frustrate some promising environmental solutions. Attachments of community are likewise challenged as complicit, with new constructions of community offered as potential remedies. The crisis has required a rethinking of conventional theories of justice, with new conceptions and novel hybrids between existing ones allowing us to conceive of and articulate environment-mediated injuries and construct solutions in creative new ways. Examination of each of these ideals and its role in intensifying or diffusing the crisis forms the basis of this book’s eight substantive chapters.

      Since societies must soon transition to becoming ecologically sustainable, as we shall consider in more detail in chapter 2, sustainability captures a set of objectives for social institutions and practices, with the ideal orienting the present toward a future that is possible, necessary, and desirable. While few may find attractive the sustainable society that does not also embrace other ideals like justice and democracy, in many ways the sustainable serves as a vital complement to these other ideals, seeking to maintain the material preconditions for society to perform its most basic provisioning functions, as well as realizing the other aspirations that we see expressed in its various ideals. The other ideals thus also serve as important constraints upon sustainability – for example, in maintaining its humanitarian aspirations.

      Where we recognize multiple and (sometimes) incommensurable ideals, the pursuit of any one of them can be constrained by the existence and imperative nature of the others. We want our political system to be democratic, but also to be able to take actions necessary to avoid catastrophic climate change. We want to create resilient cities, but must respect the rights and liberties of their residents. We want to protect biodiversity, but struggle to do so in the face of a view of progress for which it gets in the way. As we shall explore in these pages, these can take the form of a dilemma: suggesting that we must choose between democracy and sustainability,