Repairable Systems Reliability Analysis. Rajiv Nandan Rai

Super-Matrix (Part 2) Limit Super-Matrix (Part 1) Limit Super-Matrix (Part 2)

      18  Appendix C Pairwise Comparisons and Estimation of Weights for AHP

      19  Appendix D F Distribution Table

      20  Appendix E Normal Distribution Table

      21  Appendix F Chi Square Table

      22  Appendix G Critical Values for Cramér-von Mises Test

      23  Index

      24  Also of Interest Check out these published and forthcoming titles in the Performability Engineering Series

      25  End User License Agreement

      List of Tables

      1 Chapter 2Table 2.1 Rotating machine failure data of Example 2.2.Table 2.2 MCF and confidence calculations.Table 2.3 Example 2.3—Burn-in period determination.Table 2.4 Data for Example 2.4.Table 2.5 List of failure categories and counts for all 53 ROVs.Table 2.6 Failure Counts in Months Corresponding their Failure Modes.Table 2.7 MCF calculation by combining all failure modes.Table 2.8 MCF calculation for individual category at 24 months.Table 2.9 A sample of collected data.Table 2.10 Exercise 1: Failure data of three systems.

      2 Chapter 3Table 3.1 Time to failure data (hours) of aero engines of Example 3.2.Table 3.2 Virtual age–based reliability metrics.Table 3.3 Time to failure data (hours) of Example 3.4.Table 3.4 Time to failure data (hours) of Example 3.5.Table 3.5 Time between failures for a compressor.

      3 Chapter 4Table 4.1 Hypothesis tests.

      4 Chapter 5Table 5.1 Maintenance modeling in repairable systems.Table 5.2 Relative outcome of the two overhaul cycles.Table 5.3 Relative outcome of the two overhaul cycles.Table 5.4 Comparative results of both overhaul cycles (Variant 1).Table 5.5 Comparative results of both overhaul cycles (Variant 2).Table 5.6 Results-failure mode wise for first overhaul cycle.Table 5.7 Results-failure mode wise fort_2OH.Table 5.8 Failure mode wise percent improvement.Table 5.9 Comparative results of both overhaul cycles for the aero engine.

      5 Chapter 6Table 6.1 Extensions to standard FMEA.Table 6.2 Failure cause-mode effect relationship.Table 6.3 Severity rating.Table 6.4 Occurrence rating.Table 6.5 Failure mode wise initial RPN.Table 6.6 Failure mode wise values of final Q.Table 6.7 Final RPNs.Table 6.8 FM1.Table 6.9 FM2.Table 6.11 Comparative results.

      6 Chapter 7Table 7.1 Brief literature review on WSCE using MCDM.Table 7.2 Weights for API.Table 7.3 Actual and scaled API values of each weapon category.Table 7.4 APV estimation of combat force “ALPHA”.Table 7.5 APV enhancement.Table 7.6 API_ij values.Table 7.7 C_ij (million USD), a_i, d_i, and m_i.Table 7.8 A_ij values.Table 7.9 Optimal x_ij values.

      7 Chapter 8Table 8.1 Brief literature review on TH analysis.Table 8.2 Required TH of the three components.Table 8.3 Process requirements of LPCR blades repair.Table 8.4 Process requirements of CCOC repair.Table 8.5 Process requirements of LPTR blades repair.Table 8.6 Component 1—LPCR blades.Table 8.7 Component 2—CCOC.Table 8.8 Component 3—LPTR blades.

      8 Appendix ATable A1 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT MF.Table A2 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT FI.Table A3 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT GN.Table A4 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT AB.Table A5 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPC WRT MF.Table A6 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPC WRT FI.Table A7 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPC WRT AH.Table A8 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPC WRT RK.Table A9 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPC WRT AAM.Table A10 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPC WRT SAM.Table A11 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPC WRT FB.Table A12 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPC WRT RPV.Table A13 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPC WRT AB.Table A14 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPCH WRT MF.Table A15 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPCH WRT FI.Table A16 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPCH WRT RK.Table A17 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPCH WRT SAM.Table A18 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPCH WRT GN.Table A19 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPCH WRT FB.Table A20 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPCH WRT RPV.Table A21 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWPCH WRT AB.Table A22 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT MF.Table A23 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FI.Table A24 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT AH.Table A25 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FB.Table A26 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT FL.Table A27 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT SA.Table A28 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT UB.Table A29 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT RN.Table A30 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT SH.Table A31 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT MOB.Table A32 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT DIS.Table A33 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT FPD.Table A34 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT MR.Table A35 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT W3.Table A36 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT W1.Table A37 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT W2.Table A38 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT VER.Table A39 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT SPD.Table A40 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT RAP.Table A41 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT RES.Table A42 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT RTR.Table A43 Pairwise comparison in cluster APWC WRT ROA.Table A44 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A45 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT SA.Table A46 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT UB.Table A47 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT SH.Table A48 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT CS.Table A49 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT REL.Table A50 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT SPD.Table A51 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A52 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A53 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A54 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A55 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A56 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A57 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A58 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A59 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A60 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A61 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A62 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A63 Pairwise comparison in cluster ALT WRT FL.Table A64 Pairwise comparison in the cluster MATRIX WRTAPWC.Table A65 Pairwise comparison in the cluster MATRIX WRTAPWPC.

      9 Appendix CTable C1 Comparison of APWC WRT DEFENCE.Table C2 Comparison of APWC WRT ATTACK.Table C3 Composite impact of AP operations on APWC.Table C4 Comparison of APWPC WRT MF.Table C5 Comparison of APWPC WRT FI.Table C6 Comparison of APWPC WRT AH.Table C7 Comparison of APWPC WRT RK.Table C8 Comparison of APWPC WRT AAM.Table C9 Comparison of APWPC WRT SAM.Table C10 Comparison of APWPC WRT GN.Table C11 Comparison of APWPC WRT FB.Table C12 Comparison of APWPC WRT ASM.Table C13 Comparison of APWPC WRT SSM.Table C14 Comparison of APWPC WRT RPV.Table C15 Comparison of APWPC WRT AB.Table C16 Composite impact of APWPC on APWC.Table C17 Comparison of APWPCH WRT FL.Table C18 Comparison of APWPCH WRT SA.Table C19 Comparison of APWPCH WRT UB.Table C20 Comparison of APWPCH WRT RN.Table C21 Comparison of APWPCH WRT SH.Table C22 Comparison of APWPCH WRT CS.Table C23 Comparison of APWPCH WRT REL.

      List of Illustrations

      1 Chapter 1Figure 1.1 Types of repair.Figure 1.2 Various techniques for reliability analysis.

      2 Chapter 2Figure 2.1 A MCF example.Figure 2.2 An improving system.Figure 2.3 A stable system.Figure 2.4 A deteriorating system.Figure 2.5 History and distribution of failures