J. C. Das

Arc Flash Hazard Analysis and Mitigation


Скачать книгу

No impact None LV/MV switchgear Solid dielectric bus Medium Yes Yes No change Low Low Moderate None MV switchgear Reduction Differential protraction High Yes Yes No change High Medium impact Significant LV/MV switchgear ZSI Medium Yes Yes No change Low Medium Moderate Significant LV switchgear/ switchboard Transfer trip High Yes Yes Increased High Medium impact Significant LV switchgear fed from transformers of >750 kVA

      TABLE 1.16. Measures for Mitigating Arc Flashes at Key Locations in Data Centers

System Location Issue Recommendations
LV service entrance equipment Protection on HV side of transformer does not respond quickly for LV faults Transfer trip, differential protection along with ZSI
UPS input/output switchboards Selectivity requirements lead to extended clearing times ZSI or optical detection
PDU secondary (480 V to 208/120 V) Low fault levels and P combined with transformer inrush currents extend arc-clearing times Maintenance switch, compartmentalization of PDU with administrative controls
Generator paralleling equipment Low fault levels combined with multiple sources extend arc-clearing times Bus differential or optical detection, adaptive relay settings
MV distribution equipment Multiple utility sources and/or generator sources result in high fault currents High-speed shorting switch, bus differential, and optical relaying
images

      1.15.2 Arc Flash Labels

      1 The calculated symmetrical three-phase bolted fault in a 480-V switchgear assembly is 40 kA. Using IEEE equations, calculate the arc fault current. Assuming that the fault is cleared in 0.1 seconds, both for Ia and 85% Ia, calculate the incident energy release and arc flash boundary. Use the gap length and working distance as per IEEE tables. The 480 V three-phase system is high resistance grounded.

      2 Repeat with Lee’s equations.

      3 Repeat using Equation (1.9) of the text.

      4 Consult NFPA 70 E and the text in this paper and specify the PPE outfits for category 3 and 4 hazard levels in detail.

      5 What is the IEEE intent of calculating a second arcing fault current at 85% of Ia?

      6 List five points in order of their importance for worker’s safety.

      1 W.A. Brown and R. Shapiro, “Incident energy reduction techniques,” IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 53–61, May/June 2009.

      2 T. Gammon and J. Mathews, “Conventional and recommended arc power and energy calculations and arc damage assessment,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 197–203, May/June 2003.

      3 T. Gammon and J. Mathews, “Instantaneous arcing fault models developed for building system analysis,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 197–203, Jan./Feb. 2001.

      4 V.V. Terzija and H.J. Koglin, “On the modeling of long arc in still air and arc resistance calculations,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1012–1017, July 2004.

      5 A.D. Stokes and D.K. Sweeting, “Electrical arcing burn hazards,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 134–142, Jan./Feb. 2006.

      6 H.B. Land, III, “Determination of the case of arcing faults in low-voltage switchboards,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 430–436, March/April 2008.

      7 H.B. Land, III, “The behavior of arcing faults in low-voltage switchboards,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 437–444, March/April 2008.

      8 R. Wilkins, M. Allison, and M. Lang, “Effects of electrode orientation in arc flash testing,” in Proc. IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, Hong Kong, pp. 459–465, 2005.

      9 IEEE 1584, IEEE Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations, 2002.

      10 J.C. Das, “Arc flash hazard,” in McGraw-Hill Year Book of Science and Technology, pp. 18–20, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2008.

      11 R. Lee, “The other electrical hazard: Electrical arc blast burns,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 1A-18, no. 3, pp.