Группа авторов

DNA- and RNA-Based Computing Systems


Скачать книгу

469/501 24 300 72 Fluorogen structure of the fluorogen dye DFHBI (spinach). 4TS0 [62] DFHBI‐1T Spinach2 560 482/505 31 000 94 Fluorogen structure of the fluorogen dye DFHBI-1T (spinach 2). 6B3K [63] DFHBI‐2T Spinach2 1300 500/523 29 000 12 Fluorogen structure of the fluorogen dye DFHBI-2T (spinach 2). 6B3K [63] TO‐1 Mango 3 510/535 77 500 14 Fluorogen structure of the fluorogen dye TO-1 (Mango). 5V3F [64] DFHO Corn 70 505/545 29 000 25 Fluorogen structure of the fluorogen dye DFHO (Corn). 6E80 [65] DIR DIR apt 86 600/646 134 000 26 Fluorogen structure of the fluorogen dye DIR (DIR apt). 3T0W [66] Mal. Green MG aptamer 117 630/650 150 000 19 Fluorogen structure of the fluorogen dye Mal.Green (MG aptamer). 1Q8N [67] DIR‐pro DIR2s‐Apt 252 600/658 164 000 33 Fluorogen structure of the fluorogen dye DIR-pro (DIR2s-Apt). 6D89 [61] TO‐3 Mango 6–8 637/658 9300 N/A Fluorogen structure of the fluorogen dye TO-3 (Mango). 5V3F [64]

      a Φ referred to quantum yield of the complex expressed in percentage.

      b Protein Data Bank ID number.

      A highly effective RNA‐based fluorogenic unit should possess specific features. The ideal dye needs to display a high absorption coefficient (ɛ) to ensure sensitive detection and to minimize fluorescence background. The fluorophore should show a low ratio of photons absorbed to photons emitted (quantum yield), meaning it should have a high fluorescence enhancement and brightness. The RNA–fluorophore interaction should be highly specific and occur with high affinity to make it possible to use low concentrations while still obtaining high contrast and keeping background fluorescence low. The aptamer–fluorophore complex also needs to be photostable to extend the ability for data acquisition. Often, these types of fluorogenic aptamers have superior characteristics over the electrochemical and colorimetric approach for sensing and imaging. For example, RNA strands do not require chemical conjugation, and the RNA aptamer provides high sensitivity and high speed of response while also exhibiting high spatial resolution [68,69].

      More recently, a novel and much less intracellular toxic RNA aptamer, as compared with MG RNA aptamer, Spinach RNA aptamer, was developed [62]. The Spinach RNA aptamer binds the green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorophore analog DFHBI ((Z)‐4‐(3,5‐difluoro‐4‐hydroxybenzylidene)‐1,2‐dimethyl‐1H‐imidazol‐5(4H)‐one) [72]. The work on the Spinach aptamer has been extended to produce Spinach 2 that has much greater thermostability and brightness. However, Spinach 2 is more susceptible to degradation by nucleases [63,73]. Further effort has been made to develop yet another “vegetable” aptamer called Broccoli that binds DFHBI‐1T (derivative of the DFHBI dye) [74].

      The interaction between the aptamer and its target often causes slight structural rearrangement in favor of stabilization of the RNA–ligand complex. This feature can be used to control RNA–ligand binding allosterically, where the allosteric site (sensing module) can be connected to the aptamer region (reporting module) through a communication module. This strategy was developed by Ronald Breaker using ribozymes as reporting modules [75,76], and later a similar strategy was implemented using MG‐binding RNA aptamer as a reporter unit [77,78]. Allosteric biosensors can also be used for protein detection for specific applications [79]. With these biosensors, target metabolite molecules as well as enzymes participating in an intracellular pathway can be identified. For instance, RNA biosensors are now commonly used to sense the presence of the following metabolites: cyclic AMP [80], cyclic di‐AMP [73], S‐adenosylmethionine (SAM) [81], FMN [78], S‐adenosyl‐L‐homocysteine