2.2 Royal Cemeteries and Cities
The Late Naqada culture
By 3400 people throughout Egypt surrounded themselves with similar tools and objects in life and in death, which shows us that they shared a common culture, coined Naqada IIC and III by modern archaeologists. But they did not live under a single political structure. Various centers of power coexisted within a network of villages that spread across the country. The three centers that seem to have been the most prominent were all located in a 125‐mile (200‐kilometer) stretch in the southern half of Egypt: Hierakonpolis, Naqada, and Abydos. Especially the cemeteries of these sites show that the processes of social stratification that had started centuries earlier had fully developed. All these sites had distinct cemeteries for common people and the elites, and the tombs of the latter could become very large in size and elaborately built; they also contained numerous and expensive grave goods.
The tendency to devote more resources to the burials of elite individuals culminated at Abydos, located to the north of Naqada. Here was the cemetery of the first kings of Egypt, but already before the unification of Egypt some people buried there received large tombs. One tomb, whose occupant is unidentified (the excavators call the tomb U‐j), had 12 rooms and, although it had been robbed before excavation, it still contained many bone and ivory objects, much Egyptian pottery, and remains of 800 jars imported from Palestine, which probably were filled with wine or oil originally. Among the ivory objects were some 160 small square labels incised with images that scholars interpret to signify various places in Egypt (Figure 2.2). Similar markings were drawn in ink on some 125 jars. They suggest that people from various parts of the country and beyond shipped goods to Abydos to honor the person buried around 3250 BC.
Figure 2.2 In a tomb of the Late Naqada period at Abydos, called U‐j by its excavators, were discovered some 160 bone and ivory tags bearing images perhaps precursors to those of the later hieroglyphic script. These most likely indicate the regions from which goods donated to the tomb owner derived. The sides of the tags measure between 1 and 2 cm, and they have a hole with which to tie them to a container.
Source: German Archaeological Institute, Cairo Department
Dynasty 0
Tomb U‐j was dwarfed in size by nearby tombs whose occupants are known to us from inscriptions. They include three kings from Dynasty 0, six kings and one queen of the 1st dynasty, and two kings of the late 2nd dynasty. All are large subterranean complexes, with multiple rooms that were built of mud brick and became increasingly deeper. Above ground was probably only a low earthen mound. The names of the occupants appear sometimes on steles set up above the tombs, or we know them because of the writing found within the tombs on jars and on seal impressions and labels originally attached to goods. Although all tombs had been looted and burned in the 3rd millennium, they still contained evidence of their original wealth when excavated in modern times. Beads of semi‐precious stones, gold, and silver were strewn around, while numerous vessels were stacked in the rooms. Among them were many jars from Palestine that held perfumed oil, which was highly valued. In the entrance of one tomb people poured oil three feet (90 centimeters) deep in order to make the air smell pleasant.
The king’s body was placed in a wood‐lined shrine, while the secondary rooms often contained the corpses of people and animals. Analysis of the bodies shows that the servants were strangulated to accompany the king in death, while his pet dogs and lions, as well as some dwarfs, were killed so that they could entertain him in the afterlife. Human sacrifice was a short‐lived practice in Egypt, abandoned after the 1st dynasty. Its appearance at this time shows how powerful the kings were in society.
The cemeteries at Naqada, Hierakonpolis, and Abydos were attached to walled settlements which have drawn increased archaeological interest in the past few decades. It is clear that certain institutions arose in them that provided services to large groups of people. At Hierakonpolis, for example, there were industrial‐sized breweries made up of large vats that could easily have produced 300 gallons of beer a day. Since beer was a very important source of nutrition at the time, this indicates that at least part of food provision was centralized. At Hierakonpolis too there was a monumental complex with an administrative center, craft workshops, and a ceremonial area with buildings made of wood and reed alongside a large oval courtyard. Some of the inhabitants of all three towns were also involved in importing goods from outside the Nile Valley, an activity facilitated by their location near a wadi that gave access to routes into the desert. From Naqada one reached gold mines in the eastern desert, while Hierakonpolis controlled access to Nubia in the south and Abydos had close contacts with Palestine in Asia, the source of semi‐precious stones, metals (especially copper), and agricultural products such as wine and oil. The people with these distant contacts seem to have gained special prominence that gave them power over others. Egyptian society had become fully hierarchical with a select group on top, supported through the labor of the local agricultural populations. The elites surrounded themselves with specialists, such as craftsmen who created the art and architecture that confirmed their special status.
2.3 The First Kings
Images of war
Later king lists call the first ruler of the whole of Egypt Menes, but this name does not appear on any of the early monuments. There is thus uncertainty about who can claim the honor of having unified the land, the fundamental characteristic of kingship in Egyptian eyes. It must have been one of the men buried at Abydos, but scholars fail to agree on the identity of Egypt’s first king. Today many suggest he was Aha, but Narmer and other candidates are equally likely. Moreover, the ideal of the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt seems to have been present for some time before the feat was irreversibly accomplished. That Egypt was created through violent means is a basic concept expressed in the art of the period. A sizable set of stone objects, including ceremonial mace heads and palettes, contain scenes of fighting between men, between animals, and between men and animals. The wall painting in tomb 100 at Hierakonpolis (see Chapter 1) seems to be an early example of that imagery, which dominated the art around the time the Egyptian state arose. Whereas in the past Egyptologists read the scenes of war literally