of the respective teeth and achieve a common path of insertion (Fig 7-26).
There is further complication if the third molar is present. It usually will have drifted and tilted with the second molar. Because the path of insertion for the fixed partial denture will be dictated by the smaller premolar abutment, it is probable that the path of insertion will be nearly parallel to the former long axis of the molar abutment before it tilted mesially. As a result, the mesial surface of the tipped third molar will encroach upon the path of insertion of the fixed partial denture, thereby preventing it from seating completely (Fig 7-27).
If the encroachment is slight, the problem can be remedied by restoring or recontouring the mesial surface of the third molar. However, the overtapered second molar preparation must have its retention bolstered by the addition of facial and lingual grooves. If the tilting is severe, more extensive corrective measures are called for. The treatment of choice is the uprighting of the molar by orthodontic treatment. In addition to placing the abutment tooth in a better position for preparation and for distribution of forces under occlusal loading, uprighting the molar also helps to eliminate bony defects along the mesial surface of the root.
Uprighting is best accomplished through the use of a fixed appliance.25 Both premolars and the canine are banded and tied to a passive stabilizing wire (Fig 7-28). A helical uprighting spring is inserted into a tube on the banded molar and activated by hooking it over the wire on the anterior segment.25,26 This is frequently followed by the use of an open coil spring to complete the uprighting and bring the tooth into the best possible alignment for fabrication of the fixed restoration. The average treatment time required is 3 months.27
The third molar, if present, is often removed to facilitate the distal movement of the second molar. The second molar will arc occlusally as it moves distally; therefore, it must be watched closely and ground out of occlusion to allow it to continue moving. Immediately upon removal of the appliance, the teeth are prepared, and a provisional fixed partial denture is fabricated to prevent posttreatment relapse.28
Fig 7-29 Fixed partial denture using a proximal half crown as a retainer on a tilted molar abutment.
Fig 7-30 Fixed partial denture using a telescope crown and coping as a retainer on a tilted molar abutment.
Fig 7-31 A nonrigid connector on the distal aspect of the premolar retainer compensates for the inclination of the tilted molar.
If orthodontic correction is not possible, or if it is possible to achieve only a partial correction, a fixed partial denture can still be made. It has been suggested that the long axis of the prospective abutments should converge by no more than 25 to 30 degrees.29 Photoelastic30 and finite element31 stress analyses have shown that a molar that has tipped mesially will actually exhibit less stress in the alveolar bone, along the mesial surface of its mesial root, with a fixed partial denture than without it. There will be an increase in stress along the premolar, however.
A proximal half crown sometimes can be used as a retainer on the distal abutment32 (Fig 7-29). This preparation design is simply a three-quarter crown that has been rotated 90 degrees so that the distal surface is uncovered. This retainer can be used only if the distal surface itself is untouched by caries or decalcification and if there is a very low incidence of proximal caries throughout the mouth. The patient must also demonstrate an ability to keep the area exceptionally clean. If there is a severe marginal ridge height discrepancy between the distal of the second molar and the mesial of the third molar as a result of tipping, the proximal half crown is contraindicated.
A telescope crown and coping can also be used as a retainer on the distal abutment.33 A full crown preparation with heavy reduction is made to follow the long axis of the tilted molar. An inner coping is made to fit the tooth preparation, and the proximal half crown that will serve as the retainer for the fixed partial denture is fitted over the coping (Fig 7-30). This restoration allows for total coverage of the clinical crown while compensating for the discrepancy between the paths of insertion of the abutments. The marginal adaptation for this restoration is provided by the coping.
The nonrigid connector is another solution to the problem of the tilted fixed partial denture abutment (Fig 7-31). A full crown preparation is done on the molar, with its path of insertion parallel with the long axis of that tilted tooth. A box form is placed in the distal surface of the premolar to accommodate a keyway in the distal of the premolar crown. It is tempting to place the connector on the mesial aspect of the tipped molar, but this could lead to even greater tipping of the tooth. A nonrigid connector for the tipped molar abutment is most useful when the molar exhibits a marked lingual as well as mesial inclination. Preparing a tooth with a combined mesial and lingual inclination as an abutment for a routine fixed partial denture can lead to a drastically over-tapered preparation with no retention.
Because telescope crowns and nonrigid connectors both require tooth preparations that are more destructive than normal, the selection of one of these would be influenced by the nature of previous destruction of the prospective abutment teeth. The presence of a dowel core or a disto-occlusal amalgam on the premolar, for example, would favor placement of a nonrigid connector on that tooth, while extensive facial and/or lingual restorations on the tilted molar would call for the use of a telescope crown.
Fig 7-32 A fixed partial denture replacing a maxillary canine is subjected to more damaging stresses than that replacing a mandibular canine because the forces are directed outward and the pontic lies farther outside the interabutment axis.v
Fig 7-33 A fixed partial denture replacing a mandibular canine has a more favorable prognosis than that replacing a maxillary canine because the forces are directed inward and the pontic will be closer to the interabutment axis.
Canine-replacement fixed partial dentures
Fixed partial dentures replacing canines can be difficult because the canine often lies outside the interabutment axis. The prospective abutments are the lateral incisor, usually the weakest tooth in the entire arch, and the first premolar, the weakest posterior tooth. A fixed partial denture replacing a maxillary canine is subjected to more stresses than that replacing a mandibular canine because forces are transmitted outward (labially) on the maxillary arch, against the inside of the curve (its weakest point) (Fig 7-32). On the mandibular canine, the forces are directed inward (lingually), against the outside of the curve (its strongest point) (Fig 7-33). Any fixed partial denture replacing a canine should be considered a complex fixed partial denture. No fixed partial denture replacing a canine should replace more than one additional tooth. An edentulous space created by the loss of a canine and any two contiguous teeth is best restored with a removable partial denture.
Cantilever fixed partial dentures
A