Melanchthon, Augsburg Confession, 101.
38. Maurer, Historical Commentary on the Augsburg Confession, 343.
39. Rogness, Melanchthon: Reformer without Honor, 113.
40. Rogness, Melanchthon: Reformer without Honor, 112.
41. Hinlicky, Paths not Taken, 149.
42. Rognass, Melanchthon: Reformer without Honor, 63.
43. Prenter, Spiritus Creator, 31–65.
44. Hinlicky, Paths not Taken, 148.
45. Hinlicky, Paths not Taken, 177.
46. Radner, “The Holy Spirit and Unity,” 1 n.1.
47. Leibniz is mentioned in the conclusion as a philosopher who inherited the theological tendencies of Melanchthon.
48. Solomon, In the Spirit of Hegel, 62.
49. Solomon, In the Spirit of Hegel, 62
50. Hegel, Phänomenologie Des Geistes, passim; Hegel, Vorlesungen Über die Philosophie Der Religion, passim.
51. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 155.
52. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 155.
53. Fritzman, Hegel, 23.
54. Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology, 60.
55. Williamson, An Introduction to Hegel’s Philosophy of Religion, 293.
56. Schlitt, German Idealism’s Trinitarian Legacy, 23–24.
57. O’Regan asserts that “Hegel’s Trinitarianism is not tri-personal” (“Kant, Hegel, Schelling,” 260–61).
58. Powell notes that “it is necessary to use quotation marks with ‘being’ because. . .God is not, according to Hegel, a being” (The Trinity in German Thought, 120–134).
59. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 15–16, 41.
60. Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology, 83–85. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 10.
61. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 33.
62. Powell, The Trinity in German thought, 139.
63. Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology, 85.
64. Hodgson, Hegel and Christian Theology, 129.
65. This is a contested point; see Jamros “Hegel on the Incarnation,” 167–199. Also, see Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology, 60.
66. Fritzman, Hegel 134.
67. De Nys, Hegel and Theology, 110.
68. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 127.
69. For further reading see Pearl “Dialectical Panentheism,” 119–37, and Bradley, “Rahner’s Spirit in the World: Aquinas or Hegel?,” 167–99.
70. Schlitt, German Idealism’s Trinitarian legacy, 125; Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology, 111.
71. Schlitt, German Idealism’s Trinitarian legacy, 129.
72. These ‘masterworks’ particularly refer to Geist in Welt and Hörer de Worts; see Olson, Hegel 201.
73. Holzer, “Karl Rahner, Hans Urs von Balthasar, and Twentieth-Century Catholic Currents on the Trinity,” 321.
74. Burke, Reinterpreting Rahner, 80–81.
75. Schlitt, German Idealism’s Trinitarian Legacy, 131.
76. Burke, Reinterpreting Rahner, 81.
77. Burke, Reinterpreting Rahner, 81–82.
78. Schlitt, German Idealism’s Trinitarian Legacy, 145; cf. 139–140.
79. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 203.
80. Schlitt, German Idealism’s Trinitarian Legacy, 128.
81. Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology 116; cf. Rahner, “The One Christ and Universality of Salvation,” 203.
82. Rahner, “Jesus Christ in the non-Christian Religions,” 43.
83. E.g. Vorlesungen Über die Philosophie Der Religion which posits that successive religions increasingly revealed a single truth.
84. Witte Jr., Law and Protestantism, 123–124.
85. Leibniz, Theodicy, 107.
86.